Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

Page 758 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 19, 2015
22
0
0
Re: Re:

Dear Wiggo said:
wendybnt said:
His tone of voice is (possibly) revealing. When he is saying what he will do he inflects his voice upwards as if he is asking a question rather than making an affirmative statement. Almost as if he's asking if it is being believed.

In exactly the same way with PKimmage when Kimmage mentions Leinders as coinciding with the uptick in Froome performance.

PK: Dr Geert Leinders was brought on board for 2011, and if you look at the graph of performance, it is a somewhat unfortunate coincidence that it goes up as soon as he joins.

CF: Could it not have been Bobby Julich joining?

I would have thought if Julich was the reason, he'd say, "Yeah but Bobby came on board at the same time and showed me the ropes and how to derp the derp derp."

Bobby Julich has got to have helped! As a proven doper, and one that knows how to get away with doping.
 
Apr 7, 2015
656
0
0
Back in 98 or thereabouts, when Danish media would often ask Riis if he had ever used illegal drugs, he changed his answer from a simple 'no' to 'I have never tested positive'. A much more humane (and truthful) answer. No need to lie.

Froome is trying to do something similar, hiding behind this naive persona so he doesn't have to tell outright lies. It is a difficult game to play.
 
Jul 17, 2015
774
0
0
Of course nobody has actually asked him to be a spokesperson for clean cycling........they've just asked him about his cleanliness
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re:

Mr.38% said:
Reminds me of the classic: "I like our credibility", "We have nothing to hide" (folding arms).
nope. it was "we like our credibility." he did not take a personal ownership, this was not straight talking from Armstrong, when he engaged in hypothetical rhetoric like "why would I put that in my body when I was in the the oncology IndianaU ICU alliterations having a unilateral orchiectomy".

it is deflection and diversion, not speaking as an individual. "i am credible. i did not do these things." "i dont need to dope and put that in my body".

but each extra layer of embellishment is not to convey innocence, it is an attempt to convince.

edit:alliteration
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Re: Re:

Dear Wiggo said:
wendybnt said:
His tone of voice is (possibly) revealing. When he is saying what he will do he inflects his voice upwards as if he is asking a question rather than making an affirmative statement. Almost as if he's asking if it is being believed.

In exactly the same way with PKimmage when Kimmage mentions Leinders as coinciding with the uptick in Froome performance.

PK: Dr Geert Leinders was brought on board for 2011, and if you look at the graph of performance, it is a somewhat unfortunate coincidence that it goes up as soon as he joins.

CF: Could it not have been Bobby Julich joining?

I would have thought if Julich was the reason, he'd say, "Yeah but Bobby came on board at the same time and showed me the ropes and how to derp the derp derp."

He missed an opportunity there. Could have played the hard and honest work card.


"Bobby came on board and we sat down and had a real talk about where I see myself going as a pro cyclist. That's when I started getting on my bike busting my arse six hours a day"
 
Am I the only one who cringed at the second part of this line?
"I do want to be a spokesman for clean cycling. I believe somebody has to stand up for the current generation.”

How many times have we heard that exact line? THIS generation is different.
 
Re:

Catwhoorg said:
Is Froomes blood data to be published in the wekkend papers like Mo's was ?

No.

Then he is less transparent than those 8 athletes who agreed to it.
"I'm happy to do that. I'm happy to release more information when I can and to show people they can trust these performances,”
translated: I won't be releasing anything because my team will not allow me to. Don't blame me, blame the team when I don't release any more data... :rolleyes:
 
It must be weird to say things when you KNOW millions of people are positive you're lying. I wouldn't be able to go through that. Then again, I don't think I'd react well to having urine thrown on me...
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
Re:

nayr497 said:
It must be weird to say things when you KNOW millions of people are positive you're lying. I wouldn't be able to go through that. Then again, I don't think I'd react well to having urine thrown on me...

These are guys who inject themselves with drugs to become better at their jobs. They extract their own blood, trusting doctors to keep that blood viable for months at a time. Then reinfuse it, knowing full well the doctor could have stuffed up the bags and given them someone else's, potentially killing them.

Lying is a piece of piss.
 
Jun 15, 2015
273
0
0
Re:

Catwhoorg said:
Is Froomes blood data to be published in the wekkend papers like Mo's was ?

No.

Then he is less transparent than those 8 athletes who agreed to it.

Funny enough that even slightly to moderately suspicious values should be able to strengthen his credibility as it stands now (with the informed public), and they still opt out without any real reason.
The PR team should know that this is as good as confirmation of violations for a lot of people. Especially keeping in mind the lacking consistencies of what is being told about the parasite thing, JTL and Henaos blood profile problem a while back.
 
Re: Re:

42x16ss said:
Taxus4a said:
Gung Ho Gun said:
Taxus4a said:
I dont know exactly what was the most important factor to Froome good operformance in Burgos, but I know that to do that you dont need doping, I know that for sure, and he would improve as he did. sometimes a lot of factors happens together.
Was was impossible if the jump that santambroglio did, becouse it was a different case to Froome. of course if you change the team and you become a leader, you are going to improve a lot in term of results, but he improved a lot in term of performance.. that is not the same.
Wait, and Froome improved less in terms of performance :confused:
Santambrogio went from decent domestique on a big team to good leader on a smaller team
Froome went from mediocre domestique on a big team to the best GT rider in the world, still as a domestique and still for the same team

Decent domestique?

He wanst the best domestique previous year for Evans and next year he started to climb with the best, he was already 29 with a long trayectory, it is a case very different to Froome, Froome needed tolear a lot, it was a cycling to make, or to pulish, he was yopung in terms on cycling, although he was 26 already. it is very differente at the 29 of Santa.
Yes, decent domestique. He also had reasonable results riding for himself, including multiple top 10s at Lombardia, along with top 10's at TDU, SanLuis, Tirreno, San Sebastian and podiums at Coppa Agostoni, Trentino and Laigueglia.

What did Froome have prior to his transformation - a transformation far more dramatic?

San Luis, Tirreno, Trentino and Laigueglia happened after the transformation.

But then again you could argue the transformation happened when he finished second up the Kitzbüheler Horn with absolutely nothing to suggest that such result would be possible.

Amusing to read though that a top 10 at the pre-Willunga HTF TDU, one of the worst San Sebastians ever (a 30 rider sprint behind Sanchez) and a hilly race with a flat final are enough to make a transformation from a rider who never finished top-50 in GT to climbing with the best for 2 weeks plus seem not *that* dramatic.
 
Apr 30, 2009
130
0
0
The man, apparently, has very large cojones, since he is an asthmatic and takes medication that would be illegal for anyone else to take. Does it help him? Ask Horner. As we all know, some people are helped more by certain drugs or methods than others. Froome has found his niche and he is exploiting it for everything it is worth, ala Armstrong. He is the perfect spokesperson for personal greed and that is about it. There is nothing humble about this guy.
 
Re:

reubenr said:
The man, apparently, has very large cojones, since he is an asthmatic and takes medication that would be illegal for anyone else to take. Does it help him? Ask Horner. As we all know, some people are helped more by certain drugs or methods than others. Froome has found his niche and he is exploiting it for everything it is worth, ala Armstrong. He is the perfect spokesperson for personal greed and that is about it. There is nothing humble about this guy. *edited by mods*

oh yes, that would be nice. but people will restrain from saying it, if it happens
:rolleyes:
 
Re:

nayr497 said:
It must be weird to say things when you KNOW millions of people are positive you're lying. I wouldn't be able to go through that. Then again, I don't think I'd react well to having urine thrown on me...
Yeah, I've been thinking about that as well. Must feel odd to tell lies when you know almost everyone knows they're lies, and when you know your lies will be exposed at some point.
 
Apr 30, 2009
130
0
0
Re: Re:

pastronef said:
reubenr said:
The man, apparently, has very large cojones, since he is an asthmatic and takes medication that would be illegal for anyone else to take. Does it help him? Ask Horner. As we all know, some people are helped more by certain drugs or methods than others. Froome has found his niche and he is exploiting it for everything it is worth, ala Armstrong. He is the perfect spokesperson for personal greed and that is about it. There is nothing humble about this guy. *edited by mods*

oh yes, that would be nice. but people will restrain from saying it, if it happens
:rolleyes:

Gotcha! Didn't mean to offend. Just a joke of sorts. No one is really interested in any body getting hurt, just put in their place.
 
Re: Re:

roundabout said:
42x16ss said:
Taxus4a said:
Gung Ho Gun said:
Taxus4a said:
I dont know exactly what was the most important factor to Froome good operformance in Burgos, but I know that to do that you dont need doping, I know that for sure, and he would improve as he did. sometimes a lot of factors happens together.
Was was impossible if the jump that santambroglio did, becouse it was a different case to Froome. of course if you change the team and you become a leader, you are going to improve a lot in term of results, but he improved a lot in term of performance.. that is not the same.
Wait, and Froome improved less in terms of performance :confused:
Santambrogio went from decent domestique on a big team to good leader on a smaller team
Froome went from mediocre domestique on a big team to the best GT rider in the world, still as a domestique and still for the same team

Decent domestique?

He wanst the best domestique previous year for Evans and next year he started to climb with the best, he was already 29 with a long trayectory, it is a case very different to Froome, Froome needed tolear a lot, it was a cycling to make, or to pulish, he was yopung in terms on cycling, although he was 26 already. it is very differente at the 29 of Santa.
Yes, decent domestique. He also had reasonable results riding for himself, including multiple top 10s at Lombardia, along with top 10's at TDU, SanLuis, Tirreno, San Sebastian and podiums at Coppa Agostoni, Trentino and Laigueglia.

What did Froome have prior to his transformation - a transformation far more dramatic?

San Luis, Tirreno, Trentino and Laigueglia happened after the transformation.

But then again you could argue the transformation happened when he finished second up the Kitzbüheler Horn with absolutely nothing to suggest that such result would be possible.

Amusing to read though that a top 10 at the pre-Willunga HTF TDU, one of the worst San Sebastians ever (a 30 rider sprint behind Sanchez) and a hilly race with a flat final are enough to make a transformation from a rider who never finished top-50 in GT to climbing with the best for 2 weeks plus seem not *that* dramatic.
You're right, they aren't amazing results, but compared to pre-transformation Wonderboy MK2, it's almost Merckx like.
 
Re:

reubenr said:
The man, apparently, has very large cojones, since he is an asthmatic and takes medication that would be illegal for anyone else to take. Does it help him? Ask Horner. As we all know, some people are helped more by certain drugs or methods than others. Froome has found his niche and he is exploiting it for everything it is worth, ala Armstrong. He is the perfect spokesperson for personal greed and that is about it. There is nothing humble about this guy.

When did he take medicine that was illegal for anyone else?