Dear Wiggo said:wendybnt said:His tone of voice is (possibly) revealing. When he is saying what he will do he inflects his voice upwards as if he is asking a question rather than making an affirmative statement. Almost as if he's asking if it is being believed.
In exactly the same way with PKimmage when Kimmage mentions Leinders as coinciding with the uptick in Froome performance.
PK: Dr Geert Leinders was brought on board for 2011, and if you look at the graph of performance, it is a somewhat unfortunate coincidence that it goes up as soon as he joins.
CF: Could it not have been Bobby Julich joining?
I would have thought if Julich was the reason, he'd say, "Yeah but Bobby came on board at the same time and showed me the ropes and how to derp the derp derp."
nope. it was "we like our credibility." he did not take a personal ownership, this was not straight talking from Armstrong, when he engaged in hypothetical rhetoric like "why would I put that in my body when I was in the the oncology IndianaU ICU alliterations having a unilateral orchiectomy".Mr.38% said:Reminds me of the classic: "I like our credibility", "We have nothing to hide" (folding arms).
Dear Wiggo said:wendybnt said:His tone of voice is (possibly) revealing. When he is saying what he will do he inflects his voice upwards as if he is asking a question rather than making an affirmative statement. Almost as if he's asking if it is being believed.
In exactly the same way with PKimmage when Kimmage mentions Leinders as coinciding with the uptick in Froome performance.
PK: Dr Geert Leinders was brought on board for 2011, and if you look at the graph of performance, it is a somewhat unfortunate coincidence that it goes up as soon as he joins.
CF: Could it not have been Bobby Julich joining?
I would have thought if Julich was the reason, he'd say, "Yeah but Bobby came on board at the same time and showed me the ropes and how to derp the derp derp."
Catwhoorg said:Is Froomes blood data to be published in the wekkend papers like Mo's was ?
No.
Then he is less transparent than those 8 athletes who agreed to it.
translated: I won't be releasing anything because my team will not allow me to. Don't blame me, blame the team when I don't release any more data..."I'm happy to do that. I'm happy to release more information when I can and to show people they can trust these performances,”
nayr497 said:It must be weird to say things when you KNOW millions of people are positive you're lying. I wouldn't be able to go through that. Then again, I don't think I'd react well to having urine thrown on me...
nayr497 said:It must be weird to say things when you KNOW millions of people are positive you're lying. I wouldn't be able to go through that. Then again, I don't think I'd react well to having urine thrown on me...
Catwhoorg said:Is Froomes blood data to be published in the wekkend papers like Mo's was ?
No.
Then he is less transparent than those 8 athletes who agreed to it.
42x16ss said:Yes, decent domestique. He also had reasonable results riding for himself, including multiple top 10s at Lombardia, along with top 10's at TDU, SanLuis, Tirreno, San Sebastian and podiums at Coppa Agostoni, Trentino and Laigueglia.Taxus4a said:Gung Ho Gun said:Wait, and Froome improved less in terms of performanceTaxus4a said:I dont know exactly what was the most important factor to Froome good operformance in Burgos, but I know that to do that you dont need doping, I know that for sure, and he would improve as he did. sometimes a lot of factors happens together.
Was was impossible if the jump that santambroglio did, becouse it was a different case to Froome. of course if you change the team and you become a leader, you are going to improve a lot in term of results, but he improved a lot in term of performance.. that is not the same.![]()
Santambrogio went from decent domestique on a big team to good leader on a smaller team
Froome went from mediocre domestique on a big team to the best GT rider in the world, still as a domestique and still for the same team
Decent domestique?
He wanst the best domestique previous year for Evans and next year he started to climb with the best, he was already 29 with a long trayectory, it is a case very different to Froome, Froome needed tolear a lot, it was a cycling to make, or to pulish, he was yopung in terms on cycling, although he was 26 already. it is very differente at the 29 of Santa.
What did Froome have prior to his transformation - a transformation far more dramatic?
Catwhoorg said:Is Froomes blood data to be published in the wekkend papers like Mo's was ?
No.
Then he is less transparent than those 8 athletes who agreed to it.
reubenr said:The man, apparently, has very large cojones, since he is an asthmatic and takes medication that would be illegal for anyone else to take. Does it help him? Ask Horner. As we all know, some people are helped more by certain drugs or methods than others. Froome has found his niche and he is exploiting it for everything it is worth, ala Armstrong. He is the perfect spokesperson for personal greed and that is about it. There is nothing humble about this guy. *edited by mods*
Yeah, I've been thinking about that as well. Must feel odd to tell lies when you know almost everyone knows they're lies, and when you know your lies will be exposed at some point.nayr497 said:It must be weird to say things when you KNOW millions of people are positive you're lying. I wouldn't be able to go through that. Then again, I don't think I'd react well to having urine thrown on me...
pastronef said:reubenr said:The man, apparently, has very large cojones, since he is an asthmatic and takes medication that would be illegal for anyone else to take. Does it help him? Ask Horner. As we all know, some people are helped more by certain drugs or methods than others. Froome has found his niche and he is exploiting it for everything it is worth, ala Armstrong. He is the perfect spokesperson for personal greed and that is about it. There is nothing humble about this guy. *edited by mods*
oh yes, that would be nice. but people will restrain from saying it, if it happens
![]()
You're right, they aren't amazing results, but compared to pre-transformation Wonderboy MK2, it's almost Merckx like.roundabout said:42x16ss said:Yes, decent domestique. He also had reasonable results riding for himself, including multiple top 10s at Lombardia, along with top 10's at TDU, SanLuis, Tirreno, San Sebastian and podiums at Coppa Agostoni, Trentino and Laigueglia.Taxus4a said:Gung Ho Gun said:Wait, and Froome improved less in terms of performanceTaxus4a said:I dont know exactly what was the most important factor to Froome good operformance in Burgos, but I know that to do that you dont need doping, I know that for sure, and he would improve as he did. sometimes a lot of factors happens together.
Was was impossible if the jump that santambroglio did, becouse it was a different case to Froome. of course if you change the team and you become a leader, you are going to improve a lot in term of results, but he improved a lot in term of performance.. that is not the same.![]()
Santambrogio went from decent domestique on a big team to good leader on a smaller team
Froome went from mediocre domestique on a big team to the best GT rider in the world, still as a domestique and still for the same team
Decent domestique?
He wanst the best domestique previous year for Evans and next year he started to climb with the best, he was already 29 with a long trayectory, it is a case very different to Froome, Froome needed tolear a lot, it was a cycling to make, or to pulish, he was yopung in terms on cycling, although he was 26 already. it is very differente at the 29 of Santa.
What did Froome have prior to his transformation - a transformation far more dramatic?
San Luis, Tirreno, Trentino and Laigueglia happened after the transformation.
But then again you could argue the transformation happened when he finished second up the Kitzbüheler Horn with absolutely nothing to suggest that such result would be possible.
Amusing to read though that a top 10 at the pre-Willunga HTF TDU, one of the worst San Sebastians ever (a 30 rider sprint behind Sanchez) and a hilly race with a flat final are enough to make a transformation from a rider who never finished top-50 in GT to climbing with the best for 2 weeks plus seem not *that* dramatic.
reubenr said:The man, apparently, has very large cojones, since he is an asthmatic and takes medication that would be illegal for anyone else to take. Does it help him? Ask Horner. As we all know, some people are helped more by certain drugs or methods than others. Froome has found his niche and he is exploiting it for everything it is worth, ala Armstrong. He is the perfect spokesperson for personal greed and that is about it. There is nothing humble about this guy.