rick james said:
And if you're going to make claims it must be easy to back them up surely?
I list out the claims. You have chosen in typical fanboy/intern fashion to ignore them.
Froome has come along at the lowest point the sport has been in for years. Armstrong admitted his doping and 15 riders on the team admitted they were doping.
So how are fans supposed to think, ok, this guy who was going to be jettisoned by his team and never had shown any WT winning potential suddenly rips up the Vuelta and only after getting a place because a team mate pulled out.
I would think fans of the sport are entitled to ask WTF and HTF did this happen?
Froome and Sky have told umpteen lies and provided no transparency in explaining how they did not see a GT winner or how he suddenly transformed in 2 weeks.
So the list i provided above is evidence of doping. While not a smoking gun, Froome nor the team have been transparent about how Froome turned from Donkey into a Anquetil/Indurain/Hinault and yet you expect fans to believe until we see his blood bags, or a syringe hanging out of his arm?
The sport has shat on fans for so long, the fans are entitled to ask hard questions and want to see evidence and transparency of clean cycling before believing. Especially guys like Wiggins and Froome, but of all of the pros.
I think this is the clearest evidence of your trolling.
Now until you can provide some transparency and evidence that sky are clean, run along.