Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

Page 556 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Big Doopie said:
Lol benotti69 is particularly critical of garmin. Of all the people to attack about doping he chooses garmin as his worst offender. And that really is a joke.

I agree Garmin are a joke.

Big Doopie said:
Don't like Froome. When they get something on him, kick him out.

This is not an ADA.

Big Doopie said:
But they got tons on Clentadoppucci. Tons.

THey got miniscule amounts of Clen, enough to ban him for 2 years. Tons? Tons of what?

Big Doopie said:
The biggest issue I have with Clentadoppucci is that he fought his positive and fed absolute bs to the fans for two whole years while continuing to falsify results by competing. This is soooo much worse than nearly all other dopers apart from Armstrong.

Sky have been feeding BS since its inception. Do you have an issue with that?

Big Doopie said:
His personal doctor was (is?) a guy who received a lifetime ban. His only two tour wins we know were blood doped (Verbiers, Rasmussen). This is a guy who's only wins are drug tainted. Who lied to the fans for two years. Remains unrepentant.

Sky used Leinders, a known doping doctor.

Big Doopie said:
He is NOT the same as other dopers just as LA wasn't.

And yet he enjoys unparalleled support on this site. And people consistently laud his so-called "natural" ability.

What a freakin joke.

The sport is currently a freakin joke.
 
laurel1969 said:
Much as I dislike and suspect Froome....

Froome is a doper= supposition
Contador is a doper= known fact

....let's not pretend otherwise.

Soo.... What about the positives the UCI doesn't open as cases? Not dopers?

What about the 90 or so positives explained by TUE's in 2013? That's a whole lotta asthma.

laurel1969 said:
Benotti60's 'Lance never tested positive' jibe is not comparable, because from very early on there were very detailed rumours from within the pro cycling bubble and testimony.

We don't need rumors. On Froome's record of WT/elite performances alone he's as suspicious as a prominent list of other fraudulent transformations.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
laurel1969 said:
Yes they did, and they suddenly got very good.

Its a smoking gun, but as yet nobody has found a body.

It is good enough for me. McQuiad and Cookson know where the bodies are buried and they are not telling, so i guess peeps will have to wait till Wiggins in a drunken moment will out it all.........
 

laurel1969

BANNED
Aug 21, 2014
423
2
0
DirtyWorks said:
Soo.... What about the positives the UCI doesn't open as cases? Not dopers?

Maybe, but not known/proven dopers.

Just because some dopers never get caught, doesn't mean that those that do aren't dopers.


We don't need rumors. On Froome's record of WT/elite performances alone he's as suspicious as a prominent list of other fraudulent transformations.

I agree. Suspicion=supposition.

If it was a known fact it wouldn't be suspicion, it would be known fact.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Benotti69 said:
It is good enough for me. McQuiad and Cookson know where the bodies are buried and they are not telling, so i guess peeps will have to wait till Wiggins in a drunken moment will out it all.........

There is no evidence and Froome has not tested positive. Why cant you dream big?
 
laurel1969 said:
Maybe, but not known/proven dopers.

Ahh, so we're back to "it can weigh as much as a duck, have feathers like a duck, sound like a duck, have feet like a duck... But it's not a duck until the official International Duck Identification Union, an organization known to have intentionally not labeled ducks to generate bribe revenues, labels it a duck."

Gotcha.
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
Benotti69 said:
No, he doped and he is a doper. Of that there is no doubt.

Pure and utter BS. You haven't got a leg to stand on. You're no better than the conspiracy-theorists that claimed the CIA staged the attack on Pentagon and the entire 9/11, that claimed that the two videos showing the beheading of two american journalists were staged. You're not of this world. Get out from your den and try to lead a normal life for once.
 

laurel1969

BANNED
Aug 21, 2014
423
2
0
DirtyWorks said:
Ahh, so we're back to "it can weigh as much as a duck, have feathers like a duck, sound like a duck, have feet like a duck... But it's not a duck until the official International Duck Identification Union, an organization known to have intentionally not labeled ducks to generate bribe revenues, labels it a duck."

Gotcha.

You don't really know what a duck weighs and you dont really know what they look like.

If you did this forum wouldn't exist.
 
Big Doopie said:
Lol benotti69 is particularly critical of garmin. Of all the people to attack about doping he chooses garmin as his worst offender. And that really is a joke.

Don't like Froome. When they get something on him, kick him out.

But they got tons on Clentadoppucci. Tons.

The biggest issue I have with Clentadoppucci is that he fought his positive and fed absolute bs to the fans for two whole years while continuing to falsify results by competing. This is soooo much worse than nearly all other dopers apart from Armstrong.

His personal doctor was (is?) a guy who received a lifetime ban. His only two tour wins we know were blood doped (Verbiers, Rasmussen). This is a guy who's only wins are drug tainted. Who lied to the fans for two years. Remains unrepentant.

He is NOT the same as other dopers just as LA wasn't.

And yet he enjoys unparalleled support on this site. And people consistently laud his so-called "natural" ability.

What a freakin joke.

Couldn't agree more. How Contadope gets such a free pass on this site is beyond me.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
bigcog said:
How Contadope gets such a free pass on this site is beyond me.

By "free pass" do you mean the way in which most people acknowledge that, of course he doped at many points in his career and may still be doping now, but he seems like a very personable individual, carries himself with class, rides with extraordinary style, races to win, is highly entertaining, displays a genuine passion for his sport...and has a great victory salute?
 
Granville57 said:
By "free pass" do you mean the way in which most people acknowledge that, of course he doped at many points in his career and may still be doping now, but he seems like a very personable individual, carries himself with class, rides with extraordinary style, races to win, is highly entertaining, displays a genuine passion for his sport...and has a great victory salute?



A doper...is a doper...and has no place in the sport

Mark L
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
hektoren said:
Pure and utter BS. You haven't got a leg to stand on. You're no better than the conspiracy-theorists that claimed the CIA staged the attack on Pentagon and the entire 9/11, that claimed that the two videos showing the beheading of two american journalists were staged. You're not of this world. Get out from your den and try to lead a normal life for once.

So you swallow the Badzilla story that is so full of holes to be unrea?. You think Sky hiring a known doping doctor was naivety or innocence on their part? You think hiring all those ex dopers and then firing them was again misguided naivety? Well why keep hiring Servais Knavens? You believe the pillows, the dash of pineapple juice, the washing hands, no nutella, yett hey dont bother testing for vo2max or put Froome into a wind tunnel to get a better position for his TT and you think i am a conspiracy theorist.HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Sorry that you dream big and believe in miracles, in this 'den' we wait till we see independent fully funded anti doping testing and not just a few tests here or there but rigorous OOC testing every month..
 
Funny how when you say their is no comparison because someone had a sanction for doping and their is no relevent evidence against the other, the fanboys of the convictred doper seem to get upset

Nevermind it Cyclical News and you have to love one rider and hate another because you are convinced they are a donkey or alien or whatever derogatory term you wanna use

The great thing is real life don't dwell in the clinic and clinic logic can be flawed:D
 
Sep 29, 2012
422
0
0
Big Doopie said:
Lol benotti69 is particularly critical of garmin. Of all the people to attack about doping he chooses garmin as his worst offender. And that really is a joke.

Don't like Froome. When they get something on him, kick him out.

But they got tons on Clentadoppucci. Tons.

The biggest issue I have with Clentadoppucci is that he fought his positive and fed absolute bs to the fans for two whole years while continuing to falsify results by competing. This is soooo much worse than nearly all other dopers apart from Armstrong.

His personal doctor was (is?) a guy who received a lifetime ban. His only two tour wins we know were blood doped (Verbiers, Rasmussen). This is a guy who's only wins are drug tainted. Who lied to the fans for two years. Remains unrepentant.

He is NOT the same as other dopers just as LA wasn't.

And yet he enjoys unparalleled support on this site. And people consistently laud his so-called "natural" ability.

What a freakin joke.

Ever heard of a guy called Valverde??
 
May 26, 2009
4,114
0
0
del1962 said:
Funny how when you say their is no comparison because someone had a sanction for doping and their is no relevent evidence against the other, the fanboys of the convictred doper seem to get upset

Nevermind it Cyclical News and you have to love one rider and hate another because you are convinced they are a donkey or alien or whatever derogatory term you wanna use

The great thing is real life don't dwell in the clinic and clinic logic can be flawed:D

Nirvana have a lot to answer for!
 
Mar 18, 2009
981
0
0
Is it just me or is it when there are flat stages or boring stages more posters come into threads like this or even just the clinic looking for an argument?