Re:
They were (and still are being) pressed by social media to publish with peer-review. The 'missing' Henao study adds to that pressure.
So their cred, and Froome's cred, is on the line. Therefore this would normally have been a priority job. Your suggestion that they're now prioritizing other stuff, as nobody else will scoop the Froome data anyway, is not realistic.
At best it goes to show that it was a cheap PR stunt. At worst it suggest they never had any reliable set of data to work with in the first place, and we're in for another 'Henao'.
Anyway, Furber's tweet suggests nothing has been submitted yet.
lol, you think they're just giving it a rest?djpbaltimore said:As I mentioned before, this is likely a back burner issue for the scientists involved. Sitting on data for this long is not strange at all. Especially for a study of this type. It is not like you are going to be scooped by another lab.
ITA with Vedrafyrd's points.
They were (and still are being) pressed by social media to publish with peer-review. The 'missing' Henao study adds to that pressure.
So their cred, and Froome's cred, is on the line. Therefore this would normally have been a priority job. Your suggestion that they're now prioritizing other stuff, as nobody else will scoop the Froome data anyway, is not realistic.
At best it goes to show that it was a cheap PR stunt. At worst it suggest they never had any reliable set of data to work with in the first place, and we're in for another 'Henao'.
I-what?ITA with Vedrafyrd's points.
Anyway, Furber's tweet suggests nothing has been submitted yet.