Re: Re:
You go wrong in not understanding the rules both for the AAF and disrepute, in ignoring what legal experts have said about disrepute, in dismissing the Valverde case on the grounds you don't understand it and in inexplicably citing the IOC's recent actions which clearly have no relevance here.bambino said:fmk_RoI said:We appear to be talking about both Bambino. And you appear to understand neither of them.bambino said:fmk_RoI said:Pay attention Spetsa. You are applying a response to something entirely separate.spetsa said:fmk, you have explained nothing in part. The link you provided bambino explains your position in full. It appears to be based first on your belief that Froome has done nothing wrong so the rules, you agree with, they just don't apply to him. Got it. If I am interpreting your position incorrectly, I apologise. Just let me know where I went wrong.
As for where you're going wrong: knowledge of the rules. Tell me what rule Froome has broken and why the UCI have been negligent in not banning him already. Tell me why the rules for what Froome has done need to be ignored here and new rules imagined.
Now you are twisting the discussion. We are not talking about which rules Froome has broken. That entirely different debate. We are talking about the rule of organizer right to ban rider from their competition. That is a rule as well.
I am more than willing to admit I'm wrong if you would explain where I go wrong in my understanding of that rule.