• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Froome's SRM data on Ventoux

Page 29 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Thanks, from the same source:

Criticisms

Numerous criticisms have been made of the use of an impact factor.[9] For one thing, the impact factor might not be consistently reproduced in an independent audit.[10] There is a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders.[11][12] Another reason that can invalidate this technique is that there is a general tendency on the part of a citing individual to be influenced by the already indicated IF. Others have criticized the impact factor more generally on the institutional background of the neoliberal academia, claiming that what is needed is not just its replacement with more sophisticated metrics but a democratic discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers

Because "the impact factor is not always a reliable instrument", in November 2007 the European Association of Science Editors (EASE) issued an official statement recommending "that journal impact factors are used only—and cautiously—for measuring and comparing the influence of entire journals, but not for the assessment of single papers, and certainly not for the assessment of researchers or research programmes

In response to growing concerns over the inappropriate use of journal impact factors in evaluating scientific outputs and scientists themselves, the American Society for Cell Biology together with a group of editors and publishers of scholarly journals created the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). Released in May 2013, DORA has garnered support from thousands of individuals and hundreds of institutions,[42] including in March 2015 the League of European Research Universities (a consortium of 21 of the most renowned research universities in Europe),[43] who have endorsed the document on the DORA website.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factor
 
Re: Re:

Jeroen Swart said:
thehog said:
WillemS said:
Delays in publication of articles in peer reviewed journals happen; two months is nothing.


They said the same of the Henao study... it never came. Over two years we waited, Sir Dave said it was coming...

Will we ever see the Froome study this year? Next? :rolleyes:

Hog,

It has been submitted to very high impact journal.

We received a response from the editor with the reviewer comments exactly 1 week ago.

We are currently addressing the reviewers comments and will resubmit the revised manuscript before the end of June.

We hope and anticipate that the review process will then be completed.

These things do take time.

Thanks for the patience.

Jeroen
Thanks for the update Jeroen!
 

TRENDING THREADS