I suspect Lutsenko + his bike weighs < 74 kg74kg Lutsenko the third best climber of the season so far. Nothing to see here.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I suspect Lutsenko + his bike weighs < 74 kg74kg Lutsenko the third best climber of the season so far. Nothing to see here.
That’s what it says on the Astana website.I suspect Lutsenko + his bike weighs < 74 kg
That's proof enough for me. 74 kg @ 1m 74cm. BMI of 24.4. There's hope for us all yet !That’s what it says on the Astana website.
I suspect Lutsenko + his bike weighs < 74 kg
Think calling it Majka level in one day races is a bit much, but I'll be damned if this isn't one the magical transformations of old.Fuglsang is back at being the best hilly classics rider in the world at 35 despite being well known to be Majka-level.
I think it's also the fact that it's classics and not just flying away on big MTFs in GTs.He didn't go full Bjarne, but it's clear that he was suddenly a different man in his 30ies.
That said, whooo caaaares? He's an attacking rider and just like the whole team fun to watch, so I rather cheer for him and his team instead of the next boring train.
We're not ignoring it, we just can't do anything about it. It probably doesn't get as much attention because 2 monuments is a lot less than 7 gts and the progression wasn't as steep.Fuglsang suddenly became a world beater at 34 ...give me a break ...living the dream yeah ..oh and eating pasta
Dr Ferrari type pasta
The same people that condemn Froome's transformation ignore what is before their eyes here
Yes and the fact that he and his team go for an offensive approach, rather than just controlling the race until 4km to go on a mtf when he suddenly drops everyone. Of course I'm biased because he rides for Vino, but I've never been a fan of pre 2017 Fuglsang, I was bothered by the talk of him being a legit contender in a gt.I think it's also the fact that it's classics and not just flying away on big MTFs in GTs.
I honestly still have to reach the point where I give a *** about him either way.Yes and the fact that he and his team go for an offensive approach, rather than just controlling the race until 4km to go on a mtf when he suddenly drops everyone. Of course I'm biased because he rides for Vino, but I've never been a fan of pre 2017 Fuglsang, I was bothered by the talk of him being a legit contender in a gt.
The craziest rumour that I've heard about Astana in the last year or so is that Johan Bruyneel is actually working from the shadows as a consultent for Yana Seel.Michele is back!
Everybody will talk about Padun and Bahrain, but Lutsenko finishing 2nd Overall in the Dauphine and winning the time trial is pretty absurd
If you take out Bahrain and Astana the final GC looks more understandable: Porte, Thomas, Kelderman, Lopez, O'Connor, Gaudu, Hart are names I would have expected there. But you're right, I can't see the Lutsenko shine because there's this dazzling light hurting my eyes.
And why should we trust anyone from Sky/Ineos with all of their dodgy (at best) history?
F.....G FACTS.Lutsenko is 100x times more believable than Thomas, who can't even ride his bike without training wheels, winning the Tour de France let alone Paris-Nice & the Dauphine though!