Gazprom-Rusvelo

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
I think there is an undertone of xenophobia in the thread, and the PRR one about the stage today, which wasn't there when Roglic put in two amazing time trials, or when Carthy was putting in ridiculous rides earlier this season.
I'm looking at a team, so no, the focus was not xenophobic. I've also commented on other teams in the past (Sky, Astana, USPS, Rabobank, etc).

I find it interesting when there is a team 'trend'. Now, the fact that some of the teams appear to have strong ties to their respective country of origin is not really my issue ... :p
 
Re:

Zypherov said:
In all honesty, it does look rather suspicious.........
How is more suspicious than any other stage win though?

There are reasons you can point to here - it wasn't an even playing field. Gazprom clearly targetted this stage, he lost 20 minutes yesterday and the stage yesterday was so hard stage that anyone who contested it was heavily fatigued.

Of course any stage win at this level is suspicious, but I don't see why this is seen as such a disgrace on the sport by some. Most other stage wins where the top riders are fresh are surely more suspicious.
 
Apr 3, 2011
2,301
0
0
Re: Re:

SeriousSam said:
DFA123 said:
Why does everyone always pick on the Russians? Who exactly believes that Nibali, Valverde or Kruijswijk are riding this clean? It was the same with Zakarin - why aren't the Russians allowed to play the game?

Nibali, Valverde etc are the dopers we know. These barely known Russians are the dopers we didn't know. Thus, when they beat the dopers we know who have been at the top of the doped up cycling game for years, the evidence is strong they're doping, leading to people saying so in the clinic, ie reacting with disbelief.

Many of us don't begrudge them their doping more so than we object to the doping of the big names, though I concede that some do, which is wrong.

well, Nibs looked like The Etalon Of Clean Cycling today (even if you subtract 20sec for mechanical)
 
Doesn't seem any more crazy that the TTs of Roglic and Landa in this Giro. But I never heard anybody say they were disgraces to the Giro and their teams should be thrown out. Pathetic reactions.

Anyway I expected Firsanov to do something good today but not so much Foliforov.
 
Re: Re:

SeriousSam said:
DFA123 said:
Why does everyone always pick on the Russians? Who exactly believes that Nibali, Valverde or Kruijswijk are riding this clean? It was the same with Zakarin - why aren't the Russians allowed to play the game?

Nibali, Valverde etc are the dopers we know. These barely known Russians are the dopers we didn't know. Thus, when they beat the dopers we know who have been at the top of the doped up cycling game for years, the evidence is strong they're doping, leading to people saying so in the clinic, ie reacting with disbelief.

Many of us don't begrudge them their doping more so than we object to the doping of the big names, though I concede that some do, which is wrong.
Nicely put!
 
Foliforov's start time - 15:19

Wind report from nearby Lajen
Foliforovwind_zpsqgwiubkd.png


That freak gust of wind must have blown him up the whole climb. :p
 
What were they thinking being any more than breakaway fodder for flat stages ? A small team. A Russian team. Good grief.

Gazprom bikes will be in a hundred different pieces right now - there won't be any ipad waving going on. Urine and blood samples will be on their way to the most sensitive lab in the world under armed guard for the most extensive and expensive testing that AD can afford. No TUEs will be backdated, Millar, Walsh and Cookson are already dusting off quotes saying at least it shows they are catching the cheats
 
Aug 31, 2014
257
0
0
I'd like to see a list of riders who have taken their first pro win ever in an MTT deep into a GT. Must be one of the most difficult feats to pull off in pro cycling. Impressive to say the least.
 
May 22, 2016
2
0
0
Two guys with virtually no palmares on the same team get the best results of their lves on the same day on an uphill TT. Someone should do a heat scan on the Gazprom bikes.
 
When news broke that Gazprom got the invite to the Giro, the widespread reaction was they basically bought it from RCS as there was no meaningful sporting criteria by which they were better placed to get a wildcard than a local Italian team like Androni or many stronger non-Italian pro-Conti teams.

Now, that small team with wildcard goes full *** with their little known climber with moderate previous achievements beating all GC facourites in a MTT of all stages. Is it then so weird that some people on the forum then want them gone from the race asap?
 
spinyl said:
Two guys with virtually no palmares on the same team get the best results of their lves on the same day on an uphill TT. Someone should do a heat scan on the Gazprom bikes.
Foliforov has a very handy palmares for a 24 year old riding on a pro-conti team. How many climbers get their first GT or even WT win before his age?
 
DFA123 said:
spinyl said:
Two guys with virtually no palmares on the same team get the best results of their lves on the same day on an uphill TT. Someone should do a heat scan on the Gazprom bikes.
Foliforov has a very handy palmares for a 24 year old riding on a pro-conti team. How many climbers get their first GT or even WT win before his age?

Not close to anything suggesting he has a talent to do what he did today. It was a mountain TT, meaning every GC favourite gave it their all. He still beat the best of them by half a minute on the harder climbing part from first timecheck to finish. This performance was as full *** as they come, no point in trying to show it as anything less.
 
spinyl said:
Two guys with virtually no palmares on the same team get the best results of their lves on the same day on an uphill TT. Someone should do a heat scan on the Gazprom bikes.

Wow, never seen such an obvious case of "I couldn't be bothered to even google the rider's names before adding my opinion about them"
 
spinyl said:
Two guys with virtually no palmares on the same team get the best results of their lves on the same day on an uphill TT. Someone should do a heat scan on the Gazprom bikes.
Firsanov:
1st, Settimana Coppi e Bartali (this year)
1st, Vuelta a Madrid
2nd, Tre Valli Varesine
3rd, Rund um Frankfurt
4th, Giro del Trentino (this year)
4th, Ronde van België
5th, Tour of Norway
5th, Tour of Croatia
5th, Settimana Lombarda

I've ignored the Russian domestic races, but he's won all of them anyway. He does not have virtually no palmarès. That's a ridiculous accusation. Now, the fact that he's been at his best since turning 30 and that he hadn't made it to the top level until that point, that's a completely different issue that makes him highly suspect for a different reason. But Firsanov has a pretty good palmarès, especially in 2012 and over 2015 and 2016 to date including good results in mountainous races in the north of Italy.

Foliforov, a decade younger than his teammate, has much less of a palmarès. But he does have a good record as a climber as an espoir, including a time almost matching Fabio Aru - two years his senior - in a Giro della Valle d'Aosta MTT in 2012 when he was just 20, and also beating some useful names like Berhane and Formolo. Foliforov has shown good results in other U23 and developmental races, such as being top 5 in the Tour de l'Avenir including 2nd and 4th in the two big mountain stages (beating Pierre-Roger Latour, who impressed so well in the Route du Sud last year when he was climbing with Contador and Quintana) and winning the Ronde de l'Isard ahead of strong climbing youngsters like Jaime Rosón, Latour and Tiesj Benoot (although admittedly Fantastiesj is two years younger than Foliforov). So while he doesn't have that great a palmarès as a pro, he is still young enough to be progressing and put in some very good climbing results - especially in MTTs - as an espoir. That obviously doesn't preclude getting an early start as we know many riders do. After all, Ilnur Zakarin served a two year ban after testing positive as a teenager, so it could be that all of those results were similarly suspicious.

There are plenty of fair reasons to raise eyebrows about the Gazprom-Rusvelo results today. But remember Stefano Garzelli after being nowhere for most of the race won the Kronplatz MTT in 2010 so an unexpected win is not unheard of, it's just that the last few have been won by the leaders. Let's not overstate things though. Quite a few people had tipped Firsanov to do a good ride today. As well as he did? Probably not. But still, calling this result a shock is pretty self-evident; suggesting these two riders are total scrubs with no palmarès is pretty unfair.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
I have not seen it mention but Gazprom have had 5 riders test positive in a few years. No mean feat given how stupid anti doping is, but maybe they were target tested in order to try and get some bucks out of Gazprom to make the positives disappear.

Who knows in sport how deep the cesspit is....
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Ripper said:
Gazprom-Rusvelo - LMAO!

Amazing TT by their riders today :rolleyes:
they took a bloodbag late last night just for this yeah sure :eek: they've been really hammering this giro so far as well :rolleyes:

this is what you get with talented climbers saving their energy yesterday and go full on today. if you've never heard of foliforov or his results in u23 then :eek:
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Re:

saganftw said:
the most suspiscious part of this TT was that foliforov gained like 30+ seconds on kruiswijk after timecheck, he was so much better than everybody on the climb pantani is rolling in the grave like "damn son"
today's climb by him was done in 28:37 that is like 1400 vam? that is so low if you truly think that is suspicious.... :eek:
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
spinyl said:
Two guys with virtually no palmares on the same team get the best results of their lves on the same day on an uphill TT. Someone should do a heat scan on the Gazprom bikes.
stopped reading there