- Apr 30, 2011
- 48,738
- 31,384
- 28,180
Obvious take.You put Landa and not Remco? Wild take!
Landa was ready from the start of the season to race for GC, and was probably the third biggest favourite for the Giro before his crash.
Obvious take.You put Landa and not Remco? Wild take!
very bold(won't win a single GC in the coming 3 months but cycling loves legacy results I guess)
Paul double? Above yates and vingegard for sureupdate post Valencia:
1. Evenepoel
(big distance)
2. Pogacar (won't win a single GC in the coming 3 months but cycling loves legacy results I guess)
(big distance)
3. Almeida
4. Pellizarri (better than Almeida but victim of team tactics)
5. Vingegaard (Evenepoel dodger)
6. Vine
X: Veistroffer
X+1: A. Yates
Paul double? Above yates and vingegard for sure
At this rate...
Tier 1 is Pogacar
Tier 2 is Vingegaard
Tier 3 is Seixas
Tier 4 is You Don't Deserve A Tier Because You'll Never Win Again
I was not 100% serious in that post, as should be obvious from tier 4.Quoting this here. The real debate is 2 and 3
I know you were being facetious but it was sadly likely not far from the truth, so I quoted it here as a somewhat facetious but also serious endorsement and conversation starter.I was not 100% serious in that post, as should be obvious from tier 4.
Obviously we are almost certainly transitioning from a clear top-2 to a clear top-3, but when we haven't seen the incoming #3 race a GT yet (or race a GC against the existing top-2, for that matter) and we also haven't seen the most obvious pick for #3 at the end of last season get to do a proper climb while healthy this season, it's impossible to accurately assess how far that transition has progressed. And even if we're including one-week races in a power ranking (which I never have in this thread), putting someone who hasn't won a professional stage race yet and lost one to Ayuso six weeks ago ahead of Vingegaard is wildly premature.
The problem is that we have a lack of data points to change our end of 2025 assessments right now, and new ones are in equally short supply for the next few months. Which means that this conversation will be much more speculative than it is analytical until the Tour.I know you were being facetious but it was sadly likely not far from the truth, so I quoted it here as a somewhat facetious but also serious endorsement and conversation starter.
