I just saw the tour de suisse profiles. Just horrible. 4 high mountain stages in a one week race and 3 of them mtf's without any potential of early attacks. I mean at least they tried by always putting at least one HC climb into the stage (although thinking that the Hochtannbergpass is a HC climb is maybe a bit optimistic) but there is just too much flat between so it wont have any impact. And besides that nobody would get the idea of doing a long range attack in the first two hard stages because they have to save energy for the Rettenbachferner, the ITT and the last stage, and on the Rettenbachferner stage nobody will attack because the last climb is basically a mtf on the Mortirolo on a 1000 meter higher altitude. Also the ITT's aren't long enough to balance so much climbing.
The only good thing is probably the last stage although I fear that the race will already be decided and the best climber will already lead the race by a mile.
Besides all that, I really wish the tour de suisse could change their profiles. Especially the one from stage 7 is incredibly bad. Look on the section after the Hochtannbergpass. There you see 3 little bumps on the profile.
1. There are actually only two climbs and the one in the middle is probably the tunnel on the descent of the Flexenpass.
2. It seems like the person who created the profile didnt know that but he had to categorize the Arlbergpass (the last of the 3 bumps btw) so he just guessed and put the mark for the Arlbergpass between the climbs. Genius
