Chaddy said:
Why? are Spanish, French and Italian dopers more likable?
A little bit yeah..
For quite a while now, the majority of the sustained obvious perversions of the natural order of things, the comical arms "gaps" and the embarrassing miracle transformations have involved Anglophone riders.
Continentals tend to get on with the business of doping as much as they can, Anglophones tend to introduce entire globalised edifices of corruption, complete with pre-emptive information overloads, obfuscating schmalz offensives, and a mind-fogging appeals to patriotic sentiment - usually involving a constant background hum of quiet insinuations designed to invoke the image of plucky honest anglophone underdogs toiling honestly against the legions of cheating and colluding dagos and wops. An almost complete inversion of reality one might be familiar with from which ever ex-soviet dependency the Anglophone world's head-chopping proxy stormtroopers have burnt to the ground this week.
------------------------------------------------------------
In all spheres, Continental corruption is quaint compared to Anglophone corruption. Continentals tend to lie and cheat and steal. Anglophones tend to redefine what constitutes lying and cheating and stealing.
Or to put it another way - Continentals cheat the system and lie to others, Anglophones change the system and lie to themselves. Which brings a horrifyingly self righteous conviction to their approach to gangsterism which, in a cycling context, makes old school continental cheating seem endearingly honest, and almost naive, by comparison.
I'm not being exactly fair of course, it is hardly the case that non Anglophone doping set ups are all disorganised ,localised and lack such support structures and corruption networks - but speaking for myself, as to why I would find "Spanish, french and Italian dopers" at least
less dislikable - it would be that difference in background to their cheating.
That they are not backed by the same Anglophone ultra-capitalist information machine which has contrived to re-orientate the morals of a generation to such a degree that it is now considered immoral to not to advocate the killing of millions and annihilation of nations because they don't show sufficient zeal in selling off all their natural resources to Israeli "dual citizens". That they are not the faces of cyclings manifestation of the expansionist Anglophone monoculture expropriating localised criminality worldwide, and hoarding them under a giant shiny lie. They are, rather, simply dopers.
Which, for me, makes the non-Anglophone dopers, at the very least, less irritating.
----------------------------------
I am of course a proven champagne communist and semi-troll, so you probably shouldn't listen to scum like me.
However, I presume some would provide a much less hyperbolic and all-encompassing version of that rationale to explain any unique vehemence they direct specifically at the latest generation of blatant Anglophone dopers.
In short: that modern Anglophone doping somehow contrives to feel even more dishonest and distasteful, and be even more worrying in its potential for permanent distortion of the sport, than old school continental doping.