Red Rick said:Anyway, coverage from the start?
The holiday is the reason why I'm driving home, I still don't know if I'll be there on the Valparola tomorrow, but stage 19 starts in my hometown and that's just awesome.Gigs_98 said:Well actually I currently have a one month long "holiday" which is actually a one month long pause between my written and oral final school exams. Thats the main reason why so far I could watch almost every stage of this giro.Koba80 said:It's a holiday in Austria tomorrow. Gigs is also in Austria.
You've got something better to do tomorrow, right Gigs?
carton said:I think everyone is underrating both stage 20 and how much expending energy fruitlessly can end up costing a GC contender. If Nibali/Quintana need minutes they'll look for them up Grappa.Forever The Best said:Do you think that Nibali thinks he will get the 3 minutes with just on Pontives, Piancavallo and Grappa-Foza climbs?
He needs 2 minutes on Dumo before the final TT to be safe against him and Piancavallo stage doesn't suit Nibali. Actually Dumo can even gain time on Piancavallo.
I think Nibali will try something early if he manages to send 1-2 teammates into the breakaway.
Yes and no.SeriousSam said:If the data shows short stages give us entertaining riding, we should embrace them. The length of a stage isn't a virtue in its own right
Hugo Koblet said:Pinot will crack big time today.
Having a dolomites stage where action is completely 100% dependent on GC circumstances isn't a well designed stage.Hugo Koblet said:I think that this is the most well designed stage of this Giro and the most likely to create havoc. However, I fear that that won't happen. Quintana is obviously not gonna do anything until the last climb, so we're basically looking at Nibali to try something. I wouldn't rule that out though, although his team isn't that good.
I'm not sure I follow. How is this stage more dependent on the GC than other stages?Red Rick said:Having a dolomites stage where action is completely 100% dependent on GC circumstances isn't a well designed stage.Hugo Koblet said:I think that this is the most well designed stage of this Giro and the most likely to create havoc. However, I fear that that won't happen. Quintana is obviously not gonna do anything until the last climb, so we're basically looking at Nibali to try something. I wouldn't rule that out though, although his team isn't that good.
In most GC situations we'd have now it would be nothing until the final climb. But now we have a GC leader with at a huge team disadvantage, and he's not the dominant climber. If two equal climbers would go at it at this stage, they'd be locked in wheels until the last km's of Pontives.Hugo Koblet said:I'm not sure I follow. How is this stage more dependent on the GC than other stages?Red Rick said:Having a dolomites stage where action is completely 100% dependent on GC circumstances isn't a well designed stage.Hugo Koblet said:I think that this is the most well designed stage of this Giro and the most likely to create havoc. However, I fear that that won't happen. Quintana is obviously not gonna do anything until the last climb, so we're basically looking at Nibali to try something. I wouldn't rule that out though, although his team isn't that good.
So how would you design a stage in which two equal climbers would "go at it" far from the finish? I think this is well designed because the last climb isn't very hard and unlikely to create meaningful gaps, but you can definitely do that if you open up the race from afar.Red Rick said:In most GC situations we'd have now it would be nothing until the final climb. But now we have a GC leader with at a huge team disadvantage, and he's not the dominant climber. If two equal climbers would go at it at this stage, they'd be locked in wheels until the last km's of Pontives.Hugo Koblet said:I'm not sure I follow. How is this stage more dependent on the GC than other stages?Red Rick said:Having a dolomites stage where action is completely 100% dependent on GC circumstances isn't a well designed stage.Hugo Koblet said:I think that this is the most well designed stage of this Giro and the most likely to create havoc. However, I fear that that won't happen. Quintana is obviously not gonna do anything until the last climb, so we're basically looking at Nibali to try something. I wouldn't rule that out though, although his team isn't that good.
Use climbs harder than the Pordoi at the start. Either I take San Pellegrino+Fedaia+Pordoi to start with, then skip Valparola and Gardena by going over the Passo Sella.Hugo Koblet said:So how would you design a stage in which two equal climbers would "go at it" far from the finish? I think this is well designed because the last climb isn't very hard and unlikely to create meaningful gaps, but you can definitely do that if you open up the race from afar.Red Rick said:In most GC situations we'd have now it would be nothing until the final climb. But now we have a GC leader with at a huge team disadvantage, and he's not the dominant climber. If two equal climbers would go at it at this stage, they'd be locked in wheels until the last km's of Pontives.Hugo Koblet said:I'm not sure I follow. How is this stage more dependent on the GC than other stages?Red Rick said:Having a dolomites stage where action is completely 100% dependent on GC circumstances isn't a well designed stage.Hugo Koblet said:I think that this is the most well designed stage of this Giro and the most likely to create havoc. However, I fear that that won't happen. Quintana is obviously not gonna do anything until the last climb, so we're basically looking at Nibali to try something. I wouldn't rule that out though, although his team isn't that good.
