Giro 2018 Route Rumours

Page 21 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I have some questions about a couple of the rumours.

Stage 9 - This finish at Campo Imperatore is good news but is this going to be an unipolar MTF? Or can we expect a couple of warm-up mountains?

Stage 13 - Earlier it was rumoured to maybe become a medium mountain stage. I take that option is more or less disappeared?

Stage 18 - Prato Nevoso as a MTF'finish is bad enough but as a unipolar MTF? Really? Please give me some kind of hope that at least the lead up will be hilly?
 
Kyllingen86 said:
I have some questions about a couple of the rumours.

Stage 9 - This finish at Campo Imperatore is good news but is this going to be an unipolar MTF? Or can we expect a couple of warm-up mountains?

Stage 13 - Earlier it was rumoured to maybe become a medium mountain stage. I take that option is more or less disappeared?

Stage 18 - Prato Nevoso as a MTF'finish is bad enough but as a unipolar MTF? Really? Please give me some kind of hope that at least the lead up will be hilly?
- Not hard climbs, perhaps just some tough terrain. The stage will be very long already.
- no clue about that. If they want, they can make a really cool stage there. But with two mountain stages following, I don't know.
- If it really starts from Milan as rumoured, it's gonna be too long to put anything else in between.
 
a new article confirmed Gualdo Tadino on stage 10, but made no mention of the hilltop finish, nor of the stage start in Foligno the following day. Considering stage 8 and 9 are already MTFs, I think Gualdo Tadino will finish in the town. and the fact Foligno wasn't mention might be a good hint the following stage will start already in the Marche region (so, either Filottrano - Imola or the Fano - Pesaro ITT)
 
The bar for worst routes is very high for basically every GT. The 2012 and 2014 Giro's both had appalling routes and pacing. Still better than the 2012 Tour though. If there's a hell I imagine I'll be forced to watch that race for all eternity
 
Re: Re:

roundabout said:
gregrowlerson said:
If it's 60kms from the start of the climb, then that's close enough to matter. 60kms from the top would be too far away though.

60 km from the top

Edit: probably closer to 70 if counting to the finish line

Something has to happen on the Finestre, it's just too hard in my opinion. 18.5 km @ 9.2 %, half of it sterrato. Col de Portet suddenly looks rather cute in this context.
 
Re: Re:

Sestriere said:
roundabout said:
gregrowlerson said:
If it's 60kms from the start of the climb, then that's close enough to matter. 60kms from the top would be too far away though.

60 km from the top

Edit: probably closer to 70 if counting to the finish line

Something has to happen on the Finestre, it's just too hard in my opinion. 18.5 km @ 9.2 %, half of it sterrato. Col de Portet suddenly looks rather cute in this context.
Incredibly likely it would be Finestre-Sestriere-Jafferau. I for sure hope they throw something in before the Finestre, but it's a combination that is incredibly dependent on the racing situation. If there's a break ahead with strong domestiques and people need to attack from far out, it's likely that a lot will happen on the Finestre.
 
Yeah, it's hard to imagine a scenario where it is selective enough to really mean that anyone of importance (at that point in the race) have been dropped, but that there would still be doms left to drive the pace. So a YUUUGE breakaway (or at least the right one) with a good gap at the bottom is needed.
 
Re:

roundabout said:
Jafferau is 40+ km further from Finestre than Sestriere, 35 of which is on terrain favorable for chasing. Anything that may happen on Finestre will be a bonus for me.
Hard racing on the Finestre typically rips the peloton to shreds. After an effort like that, domestiques are also relatively more tired if they've survived in the bunch.
 
The possible finestre stage really reminds me on the Rissoul stage from 2016. Super hard climb far away from the finish, but quite a long flat section before a mtf and all that on the penultimate mountain stage. Sounds meh on paper, but in 2016 it worked great so who knows. Let's not forget the giro is never as controlled as the tour.
 
Gigs_98 said:
The possible finestre stage really reminds me on the Rissoul stage from 2016. Super hard climb far away from the finish, but quite a long flat section before a mtf and all that on the penultimate mountain stage. Sounds meh on paper, but in 2016 it worked great so who knows. Let's not forget the giro is never as controlled as the tour.
Yeah exactly. Many people mocked that stage (somewhat rightfully so), but sometimes crazy *** like that happens when you are throwing around with climbs like Agnello, Finestre, Fauniera etc.
 
Eshnar@ - Thanks for answering my questions :)

- Too bad about Campo Imperatore lead-up but I suppose even as a unipolar MTF it can create significant gaps between GC-contenders. If they make stage 10 a proper mountain stage (at least harder than this years Bagno Romagna) with a downhill finish to Gualdo Tadino that could work really well after Campo. Same principle as Zoncolan followed by Sappada-stage.
- Happy there is still a glimmer of hope (concerning stage 13)
- At least Prato Nevoso will be a long stage and not lack the weakness of this years stage to Oropa.

Concerning early action on the Finestre stage for me it depends on conditions. If Tom Dumoulin has a superior lead any rival might be forced to attack early on Finestre - on the other hand if the gap is less than a minute they will probably wait.

Btw are we looking at a possible 7 MTF's?
(Etna, Montevergine, Campo Imperatore, Zoncolan, Prato Nevoso, Jafferau, Cervinia)

The recent article here on cyclingnews state Etna will be climbed from the Valentino-side. Exactly how steep are we talking about and are there any news on preceding climbs? For some reason I just thought it would be unipolar but I don't know why.