They can change their opinion or maybe new information was given to them?They have been listened to. They were at the meeting yesterday when they made an agreement.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
They can change their opinion or maybe new information was given to them?They have been listened to. They were at the meeting yesterday when they made an agreement.
90+ riders decided even trying to make the time cut in a sub-120km medium mountain stage, two days after a stage where they took a day off on the bike (after the organisers already took climbs out of the stage) was 'too much' for them eight years ago. An awful lot has been 'too much' recently and in the Giro twice in the last three years we've had neutralisations or removals of key parts of the race due to them being 'too much' only to find that 'too much' was actually safer than most of the rest of the race that they actually did compete in. Hansen's last meaningful contribution to the sport as an active rider was to decide a flat stage in the rain in week 3 was 'too much', a decision that even many members of the péloton later confessed they felt embarrassed by.Sure, but riding on snow might be seen as not something they should tolerate? If ALL riders, not just a few, but 100% said this is too much, maybe our first response should be to listen?
Sure, but it's not their race. If they want all the power to decide what happens, they should make their own race.They can change their opinion or maybe new information was given to them?
Yeah a thermal long sleeve, jersey, and larger soft shell jacket would surely do the trick? Add in a snood of some kind, a hat, gloves etc. I feel like riders have probably trained in this weather before. I've ridden in this temperature! It's not pleasant but it's fine, you get over it.I imagine it's because of the wind chill. Would probably feel like below freezing if going down at full speed.
Though I do wonder if the current clothing really can't help.
No chance, it's small as feck. You don't stand a chance with team busses and even cars with bikes on top might not fit. Also it'll be a logistical nightmare to have it spontaneously open just one way (it normally switches every 15 minutes).It seems like RCS accepted to cancel Umbrail but they don't really know how to get to Prad where the stage should start. They can either go over Umbrail or over the tunnel near Livigno the Suisse national park. This is a private onwed tunnel. I don't know if a whole convoy can get through.
Apparently the RCS understood that it is indeed too dangerous. So everything was done within the law.Right now they want to be above the law, yet bind everyone else by the law.
If you are a professional cyclist at the Giro, with no GC aspirations, and a stage in the third week contains a pass that is really cold and wet but doesn't go above the EWP threshold, and Adam Hansen comes and asks whether you'd like it removed from the race, you would obviously say yes. It makes your life significantly easier.Apparently the RCS understood that it is indeed too dangerous. So everything was done within the law.
It becomes a health risk once you pin a race-number on your back.Looking forward to all the tough guy "look at me riding in the snow" off-season pictures
Cyclocross comes to mind.Hannah Walker has said that RCS will only neutralize the Umbrail which is a risky decision because it‘s also snowing on Foscagno.
It's a riders vote and has nothing to do with Hansen other than someone has to liase between RCS and the riders representatives in the peloton deciding a decision to remove the danger gets voted on. As far as i'm aware 100% of the peloton voted.Adam Hansen is honestly quite damaging to pro cycling standards...