It should be Milan. Not because of bias, but because it's the birthplace of la gazzetta and so the Giro, where the first Giro started and ended. Rome's great, but Milan should be the fnish place.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
It may also depend on what Ewan is doing and how may resources Orica put toward GC.staubsauger said:Yes, exactly. Against Modolo, Nizzolo, Viviani and a weak Greipel (or Hofland) he should be the favorite in the sprints. At least on paper!Gigs_98 said:The advantage for Gaviria is that he isn't the best sprinter of his team. Etixx doesn't need him for the Tour so they will probably let him ride the whole giro while Kittel will go to the tdf.staubsauger said:I highly doubt Kittel is gonna be at the Giro anyway. Since he messed up his Tour preparation this year when he hit his absolute peak shape at the Giro rather than the Tour. Same goes for Greipel who's certainly gonna be on a low-level at the Giro like in 2015. As Cofidis ain't likely to get a Giro wildcard I expect Gaviria to be the major sprint force in next year's race. Actually he could very well go for the pink jersey on stage 1 as well as for the stage win in stage 3. And he'd stay in the race until the very end in order to win the red jersey. So Etixx's certainly gonna give him a decent train to work for him. He's a great prospect after all and he's ready to rumble next spring.
Sciocco said:For the first three days I don't really mind it as the expectations could have easily been two very flat stages and a TTT. I will hold out some hope that stage two will have slight modifications done between now and May 6th (?) that'll lead to a more interesting final 50km or so.
42x16ss said:It may also depend on what Ewan is doing and how may resources Orica put toward GC.staubsauger said:Yes, exactly. Against Modolo, Nizzolo, Viviani and a weak Greipel (or Hofland) he should be the favorite in the sprints. At least on paper!Gigs_98 said:The advantage for Gaviria is that he isn't the best sprinter of his team. Etixx doesn't need him for the Tour so they will probably let him ride the whole giro while Kittel will go to the tdf.staubsauger said:I highly doubt Kittel is gonna be at the Giro anyway. Since he messed up his Tour preparation this year when he hit his absolute peak shape at the Giro rather than the Tour. Same goes for Greipel who's certainly gonna be on a low-level at the Giro like in 2015. As Cofidis ain't likely to get a Giro wildcard I expect Gaviria to be the major sprint force in next year's race. Actually he could very well go for the pink jersey on stage 1 as well as for the stage win in stage 3. And he'd stay in the race until the very end in order to win the red jersey. So Etixx's certainly gonna give him a decent train to work for him. He's a great prospect after all and he's ready to rumble next spring.
Eshnar said:October 25thMiburo said:When will giro route be announced?
nothing official, besides the obvious speculation "RCS recently changed owner and everything got messed up/delayed"Miburo said:Eshnar said:October 25thMiburo said:When will giro route be announced?
Wow that long? After the tour? Any reason why?
trueThe Hitch said:Terminillo stage 8. That brings back some memories. the worst stage of the best gt
I gave it only two stars. As a matter of fact, could be Venice, Milan or Rome. ITT or road stage. We know nothing.mikii4567 said:How certain are you that the end will be in Venice? Given stage 21 could be a short ITT, would they not be able to go to Milan?
It was rumoured so, yes, but it can always have changed. There's no way to go from Tirano to Piancavallo with an acceptable stage length. I would say they could start from SüdTirol.mikii4567 said:EDIT2: remember, stage 17 is due to start in Tirano
Valv.Piti said:The route looks extremely back loaded so far
welcomeKyllingen86 said:I am newly registered on this site and like everybody else writing in this thread eagerly awaiting for news on next years route.
I have some questions:
1. Concerning Sicily - are there any rumours that suggest Mount Etna could be used for something? A bold choice could be an MTT on Etna. Or any reason why it is certain it wont be on the 2017 Giro-route?
2. Concerning Zoncolan - is it possible it could future not as a mountaintop-finish but rather as a climb on the route for an instance on a stage finishing at Tre Cime di Lavaredo?
3. Are there any rumours of a MTT? I feel like it has almost become a tradition that with a giro belongs a tough MTT just as the Vuelta is synonym with a TTT.
Well the Zoncolan can be called many ways, but mythical, no. there are many climbs much more important than that in the Giro history.Kyllingen86 said:Eshnar@
Thanks!
I guess including all the mythical mountains in one giro is all but a dream . Looking at the bright side hopefully Zoncolan will be back next year perhaps even with Crostis as its predecessor.
Is the stage on Sicily highly likely to just be one for the sprinters? In that case a bit boring but securing the participation of Nibali is crucial I guess. I fear once again what the giro will lack is a strong field of GC-contenders.
I am a bit disappointed about the low possibility of a MTT - for a centenary Giro I would expect a surprise or two to make it "special" but cancelling the MTT is certainly a negative surprise for me.
Most of the mountainstages seems to be with MTF's - will there be mountainous stages finishing with descents?
And finally concerning the lombardian-like stage I assume Il Ghisallo will be included but what about Mura di Sormano?