DFA123 said:
Valv.Piti said:
I think thats harsh on CCC, they haven't exactly nursed Hirt. Their selection is 100% justified based on what Hirt has done in the last week. Gazprom, on the other hand, completely gone. Where is Androni?
Schinto can't be happy either and don't get me started on Bardiani, what a travesty.
But yeah, basically one rider from those team have anything to be proud of.
Fair point about Hirt. It's just you expect pro-conti teams to be entertaining. To be at the sharp end of breaks every day. Hirt is doing a great personal ride, but I'm not sure a rider unspectacularly battling for position with Polanc, Cataldo and Monfort is what the organisers had in mind when inviting the pro conti teams.
Yeah, it's crazy Androni weren't invitied. Probably don't have the same influence behind the scenes as Gazprom and CCC. I reckon Bernal would have had a decent chance of a stage win here, or at least a few top 5s.
That is unfair for Hirt. The first week he lost plenty of time. He was caught out in echelons, had a bad day in Etna but slowly began to improve as days went by. He is a kind of Kangert / Kruijswijk, a rider which recovers very well and excels on really hard parcours. He was quite anonymous on the first two weeks, until he did a good performance in Oropa, and then he joined the breakaway of the two queen stages, not doing an anonymous move just to gain some time, but to try and win the stage (he was the second best of the breakaway riders in the Stelvio stage and the third one in the Ortisei stage)
He has done much more than ride for 12º/13º/14º. In my opinion, he has done a better race than Yates, Formolo or Mollema which haven't tried a single thing but to hold the wheels of the GC guys for three weeks and cannot be compared to the likes of Dupont, Konrad or Monfort.