The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Are you saying I spend too much time making imaginary Giro route that won't happen?Red Rick said:I know that road.Gigs_98 said:The crucial question is what side of the Basset they want to pave. If they pave the sestriere side that means sestriere could be used as a downhill finish after the Basset was approached via a sterrato road. on the finestre descent there is a small flat section where you can turn right and start another gravel climb followed by a hilly high mountain gravel road which is constantly above 2000m. That road never could have been used because to get down there you would have to descend another gravel road, the road to the col de Basset. In other words, if they pave the Basset you could put that 2nd gravel climb after the finestre and descend to sestriere where the stage could finish.
It probably means I spend too much time making imaginary Giro routes that won't happen.
Plausible.Gigs_98 said:Are you saying I spend too much time making imaginary Giro route that won't happen?Red Rick said:I know that road.Gigs_98 said:The crucial question is what side of the Basset they want to pave. If they pave the sestriere side that means sestriere could be used as a downhill finish after the Basset was approached via a sterrato road. on the finestre descent there is a small flat section where you can turn right and start another gravel climb followed by a hilly high mountain gravel road which is constantly above 2000m. That road never could have been used because to get down there you would have to descend another gravel road, the road to the col de Basset. In other words, if they pave the Basset you could put that 2nd gravel climb after the finestre and descend to sestriere where the stage could finish.
It probably means I spend too much time making imaginary Giro routes that won't happen.
Gigs_98 said:The crucial question is what side of the Basset they want to pave. If they pave the sestriere side that means sestriere could be used as a downhill finish after the Basset was approached via a sterrato road. on the finestre descent there is a small flat section where you can turn right and start another gravel climb followed by a hilly high mountain gravel road which is constantly above 2000m. That road never could have been used because to get down there you would have to descend another gravel road, the road to the col de Basset. In other words, if they pave the Basset you could put that 2nd gravel climb after the finestre and descend to sestriere where the stage could finish.
They want to pave the road that they'll use to climb Basset, the eventual sterrato will be after Basset to go up to Rifugio Fraiteve where they want the finish.Gigs_98 said:The crucial question is what side of the Basset they want to pave. If they pave the sestriere side that means sestriere could be used as a downhill finish after the Basset was approached via a sterrato road. on the finestre descent there is a small flat section where you can turn right and start another gravel climb followed by a hilly high mountain gravel road which is constantly above 2000m. That road never could have been used because to get down there you would have to descend another gravel road, the road to the col de Basset. In other words, if they pave the Basset you could put that 2nd gravel climb after the finestre and descend to sestriere where the stage could finish.
Oh my that would be a brutal finish. But still, is it from Sauze or Sestriere? Or does it not say? From Sauze would make it a 1600m MTF, from Sestriere it can be used with Finestre, but Finestre would only be a softener (probably).Nirvana said:They want to pave the road that they'll use to climb Basset, the eventual sterrato will be after Basset to go up to Rifugio Fraiteve where they want the finish.Gigs_98 said:The crucial question is what side of the Basset they want to pave. If they pave the sestriere side that means sestriere could be used as a downhill finish after the Basset was approached via a sterrato road. on the finestre descent there is a small flat section where you can turn right and start another gravel climb followed by a hilly high mountain gravel road which is constantly above 2000m. That road never could have been used because to get down there you would have to descend another gravel road, the road to the col de Basset. In other words, if they pave the Basset you could put that 2nd gravel climb after the finestre and descend to sestriere where the stage could finish.
Jagartrott said:Giro start in either Eastern Ukraine or Tibet.
Haven't we all done that?Red Rick said:I know that road.
It probably means I spend too much time making imaginary Giro routes that won't happen.
No idea, after the descent they rode on the highway because of landslides, maybe that was also the reason why they changed the descent.Netserk said:Speaking of which, I'm puzzled why they changed the descent from Sestriere this year. At the presentation they were planned to descend the classic ascent, the same that was descended in 2005 and planned in 2013, but in the end they rode the one through Sauze di Cesana.
Hope so. There are a lot of possibilities in the area...Netserk said:Rapallo rhymes with Crocetta![]()
Preferably they finally manage to bring back the Gavia pass!Jungle Cycle said:https://twitter.com/laflammerouge16/status/1001389432052822018
Stelvio+Mortirolo??
How does such a stage work? Stelvio from Prato and then what?Red Rick said:I want Stelvio+finish in Livigno
staubsauger said:Preferably they finally manage to bring back the Gavia pass!Jungle Cycle said:https://twitter.com/laflammerouge16/status/1001389432052822018
Stelvio+Mortirolo??
There's always a truckload of flat before the Stelvio from that side. You can start in Bolzano, go over Passo Mendola and Passo Palades to set up the breakaway, descend to Merano, and then have your 70km of flat before the Stelvio.Valv.Piti said:How does such a stage work? Stelvio from Prato and then what?Red Rick said:I want Stelvio+finish in Livigno
Tre Cime is a nice climb, with Tre Croci and Giau it can be epic like in 2007. And Mortirolo, the greatest climb in cycling (now with Finistre a close 2nd) is always, always welcome, as long as it isn't the baby Mortirolo of 2017.
Red Rick said:I don't like any variation of Stelvio, Gavia and Mortirolo in one stage cause it's just gonna be about the last climb, making the other 2 kind of a waste.
Stelvio/Gavia and then either Tonale or Aprica would be interesting.
You can have the Vinschgauer Höhenstrasse right before Stelvio from that side.Red Rick said:There's always a truckload of flat before the Stelvio from that side. You can start in Bolzano, go over Passo Mendola and Passo Palades to set up the breakaway, descend to Merano, and then have your 70km of flat before the Stelvio.Valv.Piti said:How does such a stage work? Stelvio from Prato and then what?Red Rick said:I want Stelvio+finish in Livigno
Tre Cime is a nice climb, with Tre Croci and Giau it can be epic like in 2007. And Mortirolo, the greatest climb in cycling (now with Finistre a close 2nd) is always, always welcome, as long as it isn't the baby Mortirolo of 2017.