Two unjustified DSQs in as many sprints. The sport really is not in good health in any aspect right now.
Interesting that heading into 2026 that Kooij will get double Groves wage. Groves has won 9 GT stages and Kooij has won 1 GT stage.What is he doing
Two unjustified DSQs in as many sprints. The sport really is not in good health in any aspect right now.
Kooij has finished 15 GT stages, Groves has finished 101.Interesting that heading into 2026 that Kooij will get double Groves wage. Groves has won 9 GT stages and Kooij has won 1 GT stage.
Yes, but camera is a bit too far ahead, so you don't see them for long.Is there any replays from the finish from the top view?
I think Kanter's relegation may have been warranted.Two unjustified DSQs in as many sprints. The sport really is not in good health in any aspect right now.
quoted for truthYea i know its ez to hate these guys, but i actually quite enjoy Patriks persona and insights, Benji is borderline insufferable on his best days though... and today you know hes gonna go off with his lets destroy cycling pseudo goodguy takes that farm him likes on twitter
I understand your frustration. But the tactic of blaming this on me personally is a bit weird, don't you think? I doubt there will be less crashes because some random dude is angry with some other random dude on the internet for mentioning the fact that tragedies sell news and news steer people to watch that or the other thing. If you don't see the connection, let me present it: people see something on the front page (like a mass crash of TDF), then they are aware that the race exists and next time they stumble on the live broadcast, they don't immediately switch to football but watch just a little. This is like news cycle 101 (I doubt there are many unaware of it). Of course this does not involve cycling fans who go on group rides and root for their cycling heros. This involves casual media consumers that constitute the majority of views. The images of crashes probably invoke bad emotions in 99% of humans, but they invoke interest in 100% of us. Roglič became way more popular after the horrible crashes and losses. It's part of his story. That's why, at least here in Slovenia, a lot of mothers root for Primož a lot more than Tadej Pogačar. It is very complex and intricate, way more sophisticated than your simple conclusion "it's people like you". People like me - well I've been a cyclist since I know of myself, like since the age 5 I think. That's almost 50 years now. I've seen the Giro live, the Tour live (not because I live next to the route). I've liked cycling because of it's more endurance oriented, psychological appeal. I don't like football, violent sports, I don't like masses of people getting into fights. I like windsurfing and cycling and climbing. I've been in the hospital way more times than I'd like. But .. still ... the fact is that there is an element of fascination with danger in all of us. The mysteries of human psyche are deep and wide. And yes, we are immediately drawn to pictures of crashes. That's the way we are and no sense in denying it, won't help. What will help though is finding a way to prevent crashes in the first place. While keeping road cycling interesting, as opposed to let's say indoor variants which are (Brits aside) pretty much ignored.You seem to like the crashes. A large part of the popularity of cycling? Definitely not, unless you think hard fouls is what makes football popular.
But it's on youtube!!! Yes, and only cycling fans are on youtube, right. And it's the cycling fans that watch those videos, sure. No, it's people like you that watch them, not the majority of cycling fans.
Kooij has finished 15 GT stages, Groves has finished 101.
So a large part of the popularity of cycling among those who have no interest in cycling...Of course this does not involve cycling fans who go on group rides and root for their cycling heros.
Most NFL fans don't have CTE.So a large part of the popularity of cycling among those who have no interest in cycling...
So a large part of the popularity of cycling among those who have no interest in cycling...
I guess they were given a 45 second gap with 66 km left rather than with 77 km to go, which gave them a marginally higher chance of surviving. (time gap and distances from memory, not exact)I can’t help but think the neutralisation was unfair on the two in the break. What is the level of mayhem that justifies a neutralisation? Sometimes the chance and the effort to get in the break should be rewarded and if the race behind ends up all over the place then so be it?
Unacceptable that police wasn't more present when the criminals had advertised their intent.