Re:
Libertine Seguros said:
A downhill finish to Briançon is a 1000% improvement on an Izoard MTF. Climbing up through the citadel after a day of tough mountains is a great way to finish a stage.
I am dead set against the Galibier MTF (from the north, it's a super climb to append to a descent finish or tempt longer moves because of its brutal two-stepped nature and high altitude, and from the south, if they can't do Izoard cos they're doing it the following day, it leaves few options for actually good stage design). We can probably do some easy guesses as to the passes in the Pyrenees, the repetitiousness of which has gone past the point of annoyance to the point of almost comedy. Let's take a nice guess: four climbs preceding Peyragudes = Portet d'Apset, Menté, Port de Balès, Peyresourde! Three climbs preceding Luz Ardiden = probably Loudenvielle as stage town? If so: Azet, Hourquette d'Ancizan or Aspin, Tourmalet!
SSDD.
Yes, inclusion of Briançon would be a good move. That good that I can't tell whether it's better after Izoard or Telegraphe - Galibier. I guess they should try to calculate which combo and order will provide greater thrill. Anyway, I don't think turning these two in regular MTFs should be a good move. Turning them into Alpine Port de Balès could be better. Briançon is a stage finish town every third year in average, so seeing one of these two alternatives every six years shouldn't be boring, and a downhill finish like this in three years is a good measure.
Excuse me for thinking in ASO box.
And, regarding the Pyrenees, they're mentioning Port de Les, Col du Portet-d'Aspet, Col de Mente, Col du Portillon, and to Luz-Ardiden: Col de Marie Blanque, le Col d'Aubisque, le Col de Spandelles.
I think there's a lot of unreliability in these early rumours.
The start and return to France, all the way to the Alps, looks logic, nevertheless.