I stummbled over the following article from the comments section, after reading a german newspaper which announced that another famous German got acquitted of wrongly accused rape today/yesterday (depending on time zones)...
Here we go:
Wow... In the Washington Post (I thought to be a more serious newspaper)... Kind of Speechless... What has the USA become (soon we in Germany will have to deal with all that too. Everything swaps over here.The good and the bad. Sooner or later)?... Once a country I truly admired:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/poste...-we-should-automatically-believe-rape-claims/
"In last month’s deep and damning Rolling Stone report about
sexual assault at the University of Virginia, a reporter told the story of “Jackie,” who said she was gang raped at a fraternity party and then essentially ignored by the administration. It helped dramatize what happens when the claims of victims are not taken seriously.
Now the narrative appears to be falling apart: Her
rapist wasn’t in the frat that she says he was a member of; the house held no party on the night of the
assault; and other details are wobbly. Many people (not least U-Va. administrators) will be tempted to see this as a reminder that officials, reporters and the general public should hear both sides of the story and collect all the evidence before coming to a conclusion in
rape cases. This is what
we mean in America when we say someone is “innocent until proven guilty.” After all, look what happened to the Duke lacrosse players."
So far so (almost*) good.
* = But she intentionally "forgot" to write
alleged sexual assault,
alleged rapist(s),
alleged assault &
alleged rape cases. That just shows which drivel will come the rest of the way in her propaganda article to further brainwash US citizens into complete political corrected, gendermainstreamed, fearing working robots. It all goes on with:
"In important ways, this is wrong. We should believe, as a matter of default, what an accuser says."
Even more damning are the headlines showing that her intentions are clear from the beginning:
"No matter what Jackie said, we should generally believe rape claims" (She could have as well written "Crystal Gail Mangum" instead of "Jackie")
"Incredulity hurts victims more than it hurts wrongly-accused perps**"
Wow. Alarming. Disgusting & dangerous opinions (since this comes from a lawyer
)... When does the quiet majority of honest and fine Americans stand up? Where are the brave people that once built the USA? Is there anybody left? Where is the outrage? Why is this woman not instantly fired, in the land aka "hire &fire country"?
** = Important side note: That is a oxymoron. A wrongly accused can´t be a perp at the same time. And nobody at the Washington Post editorial team saw it, and edited it. What the heck is going on?
OTOH, if you guys are
really interested into the truth please read the full long article by Robert Riversong. At least
Merckxindex and
Alpe, and some more fine members of this site will do (at least that´s my gut feeling given their posting history and interest in fully discover things). Thanks upfront.
It gives a great basis to really discuss the matters without bias.
http://riversong.wordpress.com/yellow-journalism-and-the-meme-of-rape-culture/
An important excerpt to debunk the "2(-8)%" myth further (which with no surprise Zerlina Maxwell used to "prove" her "points");
"Objective and conservative studies have shown a far higher proportion of documented false rape allegations: McDowell (Air Force, 1985) 27%, Buckley (DC, 1992) 24%, Kanin (small Midwestern town in which polygraphs were used, 1994) 41%, Kanin (two large Midwestern state universities) 50%."
More from the linked article:
Writer Lizzie Crocker (a woman to adimre; fair, blessed with common sense, and objective. The absolute opposite of dangerous Femi-Nazis like Zerlina Maxwell & Co.);
"Rolling Stone’s admission that its college rape story contained ‘discrepancies’ shows how victim-centric our culture has become – to the exclusion of asking vital questions.
And therein lies the problem: in valorizing Jackie’s trauma as a victim of rape (never mind that she was and remains an alleged victim), Rolling Stone ignored glaring holes in a story that was too good to check.
When journalists did scrutinize what they viewed as weak and one-sided reporting, they were met with accusations of victim-blaming. Some likened their skepticism of Erdely’s piece to police casting undeserved doubt on an alleged rape victim’s story.
"We live in a culture that valorizes victims – where to question one woman’s claims of sexual abuse is to be a “rape apologist”…
Question them, and you are colluding in exacerbating the awful effects of their trauma. Question their actions or motives and you are “victim shaming” and “victim blaming”.
“Playing the victim” used to be a term of scorn, now it’s a daily modus operandi to score any number of political and cultural points.
Question those taking on the mantle of victimhood and you are immediately cast as some kind of aggressive, unfeeling oppressor. The sad consequence of a culture of victimhood is that it obscures real victims and obscures the genuinely felt experiences of those victims, whatever they have endured."
Some of Robert Riversongs words on how those femi-nazis smeared the true feminists and women in general (inclusive true female victims);
"The sad and awful truth revealed in the undercurrents of the Rolling Stone tsunami is that a movement which began as a women’s liberation struggle for equal rights and recognition, sparked by Quaker abolitionists who believed that all were equal in God’s eyes – such as Lucretia Mott, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Susan B. Anthony –
has devolved into an ideology of female victimization at the hands of men and patriarchy. Such an ideology, and the movement built around it, actually diminishes the status of women while vilifying the character of men, thereby militating against the kind of egalitarian and just community that the original feminists envisioned."