Re:
There should be more of these cases - Just concluded a famous case in Australia involving horse racing trainers - Four trainers had horse/s test positive to a prohibited substance - The Horse Racing Tribunal found the trainers guilty even though the lab's that processed the samples didn't have the accreditation to test for that kind of substance - Trainers appealed to an Administrative Tribunal ( a step under a court ) which reversed the decision because the lab's failed to have the accreditation to perform the test.
icefire said:python said:i haven' seen anywhere the key question addressed - how a civilian court can have a precedent without the sporting body's agreement, which in this case is the uci ? shouldn't the uci agree for heras to get back his vuelta ?
i somehow doubt it.
There's a full press release with more details here (in Spanish)
http://www.elmundo.es/elmundodeporte/2011/06/24/ciclismo/1308912735.html
It's clear that the positive is overturned on a technicality, but the sport governing bodies all around the world should pay attention to the following paragraph:
En este sentido, advierte de que en los casos como en el examinado, en que se ejerce la potestad disciplinaria en relación con un corredor que participa en una competición oficial internacional celebrada en España y, por tanto, bajo la tutela del Consejo Superior de Deportes, la RFEC está ejerciendo una función pública por delegación como agente colaborador de la administración pública, "por lo que debió entrar a examinar la conformidad o no a Derecho de dicha resolución con arreglo al ordenamiento jurídico español".
RFEC ruling an international competition held in Spain, and therefore under supervision of the High Council for Sports, is running a public service per delegation as a partner agent of the public administration. So RFEC had to analyse the conformity of its resolution to Spanish Law.
The article then goes on to list the irregularities of the process focusing on the delivery of the test samples to the lab and the analytical methods not following the certified procedures.
There should be more of these cases - Just concluded a famous case in Australia involving horse racing trainers - Four trainers had horse/s test positive to a prohibited substance - The Horse Racing Tribunal found the trainers guilty even though the lab's that processed the samples didn't have the accreditation to test for that kind of substance - Trainers appealed to an Administrative Tribunal ( a step under a court ) which reversed the decision because the lab's failed to have the accreditation to perform the test.