The CyclingNews article (http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/75th-tour-de-suisse-upt/preview) published on the eve of the start of the Tour de Suisse describes the race:
"With the Tour de France looming larger and larger on the cycling horizon, the Tour de Suisse represents the last major stage race for the overall Tour contenders and sprinters to get an important block of racing in their legs."
The article goes on to note that the competition will be fierce:
"Frank Schleck (Leopard Trek) wears race number one as defending champion but will face some major competition from riders of the calibre of Tejay Van Garderen (HTC-Highroad), Christian Vande Velde and Ryder Hesjedal (Garmin-Cervelo) and Andreas Klöden, Chris Horner, Levi Leipheimer (RadioShack)"
and that:
"Virtually all the big-name sprinters opt for the Tour de Suisse rather than the Critérium du Dauphiné because it helps them hit top form for the opening stages of the Tour de France."
I have read thousands of times that the best training is racing. I have never, ever heard of a rider saying that training for racing was a better way to prepare for racing. But now, two days before the start of the TdS, Horner announces that he doesn't want to ride the TdS, nor does he need to (obsoleting the Radio Shack lineup announced in the CyclingNews article.)
http://velonews.competitor.com/2011...swiss-tour-takes-a-new-route-to-france_177815
Apparently Horner's big objection to riding the Dauphine or the TdS was that his diet (beetroot juice???) would be impossible to maintain in Europe...
The VN article notes that:
"It is unusual, but not unheard of, for a Tour GC rider to skip both the Criterium du Dauphiné and the Tour of Switzerland. Defending champion Alberto Contador (Saxo Bank) passed on both races after winning a demanding Giro d’Italia, though the controversy-embattled Spaniard has not yet committed to racing the Tour."
I can understand Contador wanting to rest after such a demanding Giro, but it's hard for me to understand the need for resting after the ToC. Does Horner really need six weeks of rest with no racing to prepare for the TdF? Does he really feel that that is what is going to put him on the podium as he boasted after winning the ToC?
I made a tongue in cheek post previously that I thought was funny. None of the other posters or other moderators agreed that it was funny. I apologize for that. I suppose that my sense of humor must need some rest. Or some training. Or some racing. Or something...
The point is that Horner's decision to not race at all between the ToC and the TdF raised my eyebrows at least. Doesn't this topic deserve discussion?
(And to the person who accused me of slander by altering Horner's quote, there was a case before the Supreme Court -- New York Times v. Sullivan, 1964 -- that applies a different standard for libel when applied to public figures. One article noted "The Sullivan case was hugely important, better safeguarding the press to challenge, criticize, and satirize elected officials and public figures.")
"With the Tour de France looming larger and larger on the cycling horizon, the Tour de Suisse represents the last major stage race for the overall Tour contenders and sprinters to get an important block of racing in their legs."
The article goes on to note that the competition will be fierce:
"Frank Schleck (Leopard Trek) wears race number one as defending champion but will face some major competition from riders of the calibre of Tejay Van Garderen (HTC-Highroad), Christian Vande Velde and Ryder Hesjedal (Garmin-Cervelo) and Andreas Klöden, Chris Horner, Levi Leipheimer (RadioShack)"
and that:
"Virtually all the big-name sprinters opt for the Tour de Suisse rather than the Critérium du Dauphiné because it helps them hit top form for the opening stages of the Tour de France."
I have read thousands of times that the best training is racing. I have never, ever heard of a rider saying that training for racing was a better way to prepare for racing. But now, two days before the start of the TdS, Horner announces that he doesn't want to ride the TdS, nor does he need to (obsoleting the Radio Shack lineup announced in the CyclingNews article.)
http://velonews.competitor.com/2011...swiss-tour-takes-a-new-route-to-france_177815
Apparently Horner's big objection to riding the Dauphine or the TdS was that his diet (beetroot juice???) would be impossible to maintain in Europe...
The VN article notes that:
"It is unusual, but not unheard of, for a Tour GC rider to skip both the Criterium du Dauphiné and the Tour of Switzerland. Defending champion Alberto Contador (Saxo Bank) passed on both races after winning a demanding Giro d’Italia, though the controversy-embattled Spaniard has not yet committed to racing the Tour."
I can understand Contador wanting to rest after such a demanding Giro, but it's hard for me to understand the need for resting after the ToC. Does Horner really need six weeks of rest with no racing to prepare for the TdF? Does he really feel that that is what is going to put him on the podium as he boasted after winning the ToC?
I made a tongue in cheek post previously that I thought was funny. None of the other posters or other moderators agreed that it was funny. I apologize for that. I suppose that my sense of humor must need some rest. Or some training. Or some racing. Or something...
The point is that Horner's decision to not race at all between the ToC and the TdF raised my eyebrows at least. Doesn't this topic deserve discussion?
(And to the person who accused me of slander by altering Horner's quote, there was a case before the Supreme Court -- New York Times v. Sullivan, 1964 -- that applies a different standard for libel when applied to public figures. One article noted "The Sullivan case was hugely important, better safeguarding the press to challenge, criticize, and satirize elected officials and public figures.")