Scarponi said:Of course, all I said was have a go. Valverde sprinting at full ball up the flèche will always be a different proposition. You wouldn't know until he gets there thoughJspear said:Scarponi said:Surprised Richie doesn't go for flèche wallone
It's much steeper. Also just because he looks this good against this competition doesn't mean he'd look/do that well on the Mur De huy against the best.
He'd go ok, Porte has put decent time into Henao, Gerrans and Evans amongst others on Wilunga. Valverde is about the only one he probably won't beat with form like today IMO unless Gilbert finds his 2011 form.Jspear said:Scarponi said:Of course, all I said was have a go. Valverde sprinting at full ball up the flèche will always be a different proposition. You wouldn't know until he gets there thoughJspear said:Scarponi said:Surprised Richie doesn't go for flèche wallone
It's much steeper. Also just because he looks this good against this competition doesn't mean he'd look/do that well on the Mur De huy against the best.
I know...he does well in week long races. He'd probably have to sacrifice his ambitions there to train specifically for FW.
Jspear said:I was expecting more from Michael Woods today and overall in the GC....will be interesting to see what he says the problem was. He seemed pretty confident about his form earlier this week.
42x16ss said:He'd go ok, Porte has put decent time into Henao, Gerrans and Evans amongst others on Wilunga. Valverde is about the only one he probably won't beat with form like today IMO unless Gilbert finds his 2011 form.Jspear said:Scarponi said:Of course, all I said was have a go. Valverde sprinting at full ball up the flèche will always be a different proposition. You wouldn't know until he gets there thoughJspear said:Scarponi said:Surprised Richie doesn't go for flèche wallone
It's much steeper. Also just because he looks this good against this competition doesn't mean he'd look/do that well on the Mur De huy against the best.
I know...he does well in week long races. He'd probably have to sacrifice his ambitions there to train specifically for FW.
HelloDolly said:Jspear said:I was expecting more from Michael Woods today and overall in the GC....will be interesting to see what he says the problem was. He seemed pretty confident about his form earlier this week.
He was out of position earler so had too much time to make up..Cannondale didn't do well keeping him near the front imo
Jspear said:HelloDolly said:Jspear said:I was expecting more from Michael Woods today and overall in the GC....will be interesting to see what he says the problem was. He seemed pretty confident about his form earlier this week.
He was out of position earler so had too much time to make up..Cannondale didn't do well keeping him near the front imo
Yeah....I still feel like he could have done better than he did. Today he was almost there...just out of reach of the front group of 7. Then he lost just over a minute.
I would say he's on par, maybe minus Martin's finishing kick.Jspear said:42x16ss said:He'd go ok, Porte has put decent time into Henao, Gerrans and Evans amongst others on Wilunga. Valverde is about the only one he probably won't beat with form like today IMO unless Gilbert finds his 2011 form.Jspear said:Scarponi said:Of course, all I said was have a go. Valverde sprinting at full ball up the flèche will always be a different proposition. You wouldn't know until he gets there thoughJspear said:[quote="
It's much steeper. Also just because he looks this good against this competition doesn't mean he'd look/do that well on the Mur De huy against the best.
I know...he does well in week long races. He'd probably have to sacrifice his ambitions there to train specifically for FW.
Martin and Alaphilippe
Lupi33x said:Australia doesnt have very good internet.
Its backward in a lot of ways.
Lupi33x said:maybe the UCI or organisers would do something if they realised how unpopular this race is outside of the venue its staged at - its little wonder the TV coverage is so poor, there's simply no demand for it.
even in Australia nobody cares about it or knows its on but for the people who live in the town that its raced around
the points system is a joke that this is awarded the same points as monuments and other big european races - what has the UCI been smoking to come up with this?
I can see why the forum has boycott the race in protest.
movingtarget said:With all of the whining on this thread why bother watching at all if it's that bad ? The same things are said year after year. Everyone knows what sort of race it is, Go watch replays if you think the whole thing is pointless. Australians enjoy it for what it is. It's too hot, too many UCI points, not enough climbs. Tune in for the Cadel Evans race for more of the same : it's not hard enough, it's too short. The answer is simple : click fade to black.
StryderHells said:Lupi33x said:maybe the UCI or organisers would do something if they realised how unpopular this race is outside of the venue its staged at - its little wonder the TV coverage is so poor, there's simply no demand for it.
even in Australia nobody cares about it or knows its on but for the people who live in the town that its raced around
the points system is a joke that this is awarded the same points as monuments and other big european races - what has the UCI been smoking to come up with this?
I can see why the forum has boycott the race in protest.
If that is the case then why do I know a heap of people who travel from other states to stand roadside and watch the race? All you have to do is look at the rides logged on Strava to see how many interstate cycling fans are in Adelaide during the TDU. It's not a main stream sport in Australia but the event is well attended by many more people than just the people who live in South Australia.
As to the WT points system. No arguments from me on that one, it's a shambles
StryderHells said:movingtarget said:With all of the whining on this thread why bother watching at all if it's that bad ? The same things are said year after year. Everyone knows what sort of race it is, Go watch replays if you think the whole thing is pointless. Australians enjoy it for what it is. It's too hot, too many UCI points, not enough climbs. Tune in for the Cadel Evans race for more of the same : it's not hard enough, it's too short. The answer is simple : click fade to black.
Hahaha! So true!
The one race that should get more coverage and surely nobody could complain about the parcours over the last few years in the Sun Tour, the scenery is far more interesting than what we have at the TDU and the course design has really stepped up but unfortunately we won't get anywhere near the same coverage of it.
You don't think fans around the world would tune in for stages like Falls Creek and Kinglake?Lupi33x said:StryderHells said:movingtarget said:With all of the whining on this thread why bother watching at all if it's that bad ? The same things are said year after year. Everyone knows what sort of race it is, Go watch replays if you think the whole thing is pointless. Australians enjoy it for what it is. It's too hot, too many UCI points, not enough climbs. Tune in for the Cadel Evans race for more of the same : it's not hard enough, it's too short. The answer is simple : click fade to black.
Hahaha! So true!
The one race that should get more coverage and surely nobody could complain about the parcours over the last few years in the Sun Tour, the scenery is far more interesting than what we have at the TDU and the course design has really stepped up but unfortunately we won't get anywhere near the same coverage of it.
No doubt if the Sun Tour became a WT race the whole of Australia would embrace it. The rest of the world however will likely still be indifferent.
42x16ss said:You don't think fans around the world would tune in for stages like Falls Creek and Kinglake?Lupi33x said:StryderHells said:movingtarget said:With all of the whining on this thread why bother watching at all if it's that bad ? The same things are said year after year. Everyone knows what sort of race it is, Go watch replays if you think the whole thing is pointless. Australians enjoy it for what it is. It's too hot, too many UCI points, not enough climbs. Tune in for the Cadel Evans race for more of the same : it's not hard enough, it's too short. The answer is simple : click fade to black.
Hahaha! So true!
The one race that should get more coverage and surely nobody could complain about the parcours over the last few years in the Sun Tour, the scenery is far more interesting than what we have at the TDU and the course design has really stepped up but unfortunately we won't get anywhere near the same coverage of it.
No doubt if the Sun Tour became a WT race the whole of Australia would embrace it. The rest of the world however will likely still be indifferent.
I know McCarthy usually does really well in TDU, but I'm surprised to see that he managed to finish with Ulissi and Chaves. He must have progressed evn further this year.Jancouver said:1 Richie Porte (Aus) BMC Racing Team 3:40:13
2 Nathan Haas (Aus) Dimension Data 0:00:20
3 Esteban Chaves (Col) Orica-Scott
4 Diego Ulissi (Ita) Team UAE Abu Dhabi
5 Jay McCarthy (Aus) Bora-Hansgrohe
6 Nathan Earle (Aus) UniSA-Australia 0:00:23
7 Rafael Valls (Spa) Lotto Soudal
8 Sergio Luis Henao Montoya (Col) Team Sky
9 Robert Gesink (Ned) Team LottoNL-Jumbo
10 Tom Jelte Slagter (Ned) Cannondale-Drapac
Cance > TheRest said:I know McCarthy usually does really well in TDU, but I'm surprised to see that he managed to finish with Ulissi and Chaves. He must have progressed evn further this year.Jancouver said:1 Richie Porte (Aus) BMC Racing Team 3:40:13
2 Nathan Haas (Aus) Dimension Data 0:00:20
3 Esteban Chaves (Col) Orica-Scott
4 Diego Ulissi (Ita) Team UAE Abu Dhabi
5 Jay McCarthy (Aus) Bora-Hansgrohe
6 Nathan Earle (Aus) UniSA-Australia 0:00:23
7 Rafael Valls (Spa) Lotto Soudal
8 Sergio Luis Henao Montoya (Col) Team Sky
9 Robert Gesink (Ned) Team LottoNL-Jumbo
10 Tom Jelte Slagter (Ned) Cannondale-Drapac
Also, what is the largest GC winning margin in TDU's short history?
DFA123 said:Based on the limited evidence here, it's Chaves rather than Porte who I think is going to be the real deal this year. Chaves is clearly nowhere near top form but still looks strong; it seems his base level has gone up from previous years - not quite at Sagan or Valverde levels yet - but in the past he has been completely off the radar in his first few races each season, now he's at the front even though he lacks any real kick.
Porte always starts the season strongly, and then is on a pretty steep downward trajectory towards the end of his main GT. Looks like more of the same here.
I'm not sure about that. It seemed to me he was getting worse throughout the Tour relative to the other GC riders. He started the Tour well and was on fire for the first week and a half. Then his TTs were pretty poor there by his best standards, and he was losing seconds here and there consistently in the final week. It helped him that Sky riding such a controlling tempo prevented anyone from actually attacking and blowing the race apart. I suppose that at least stopped him from having the usual awful day.Lupi33x said:DFA123 said:Based on the limited evidence here, it's Chaves rather than Porte who I think is going to be the real deal this year. Chaves is clearly nowhere near top form but still looks strong; it seems his base level has gone up from previous years - not quite at Sagan or Valverde levels yet - but in the past he has been completely off the radar in his first few races each season, now he's at the front even though he lacks any real kick.
Porte always starts the season strongly, and then is on a pretty steep downward trajectory towards the end of his main GT. Looks like more of the same here.
Porte looks the goods last year until he broke his shoulder at the Olympics. He didnt really have a downward trajectory until that happened.
DFA123 said:Based on the limited evidence here, it's Chaves rather than Porte who I think is going to be the real deal this year. Chaves is clearly nowhere near top form but still looks strong; it seems his base level has gone up from previous years - not quite at Sagan or Valverde levels yet - but in the past he has been completely off the radar in his first few races each season, now he's at the front even though he lacks any real kick.
Porte always starts the season strongly, and then is on a pretty steep downward trajectory towards the end of his main GT. Looks like more of the same here.
DFA123 said:I'm not sure about that. It seemed to me he was getting worse throughout the Tour relative to the other GC riders. He started the Tour well and was on fire for the first week and a half. Then his TTs were pretty poor there by his best standards, and he was losing seconds here and there consistently in the final week. It helped him that Sky riding such a controlling tempo prevented anyone from actually attacking and blowing the race apart. I suppose that at least stopped him from having the usual awful day.Lupi33x said:DFA123 said:Based on the limited evidence here, it's Chaves rather than Porte who I think is going to be the real deal this year. Chaves is clearly nowhere near top form but still looks strong; it seems his base level has gone up from previous years - not quite at Sagan or Valverde levels yet - but in the past he has been completely off the radar in his first few races each season, now he's at the front even though he lacks any real kick.
Porte always starts the season strongly, and then is on a pretty steep downward trajectory towards the end of his main GT. Looks like more of the same here.
Porte looks the goods last year until he broke his shoulder at the Olympics. He didnt really have a downward trajectory until that happened.