The problem is, as noted in the post of mine from another thread that was pulled into here, that history will always be mixed, and as many of us are posting from the outside but as jaded followers of the sport, it's far too easy to 'join the dots'.
San Millán could well be one of the good guys, as JV states he is. Garmin are obviously keen on the sports science side of things and so is he, although I really found the "Anglophone riders are receptive to this stuff. Euros aren't" quotes to be a bit oversimplistic and possibly a touch insulting. However, his team history provides dots that can be joined, even if those who are more in the know than us can vouch that those dots shouldn't be joined.
We must forgive those on the inside their annoyance at seeing clean guys (on all sides of the sport, riders, DSes, docs, team managers, mechanics etc) getting side-swiped by discussion like this (after all, as previously noted, while clean riders may be increasingly easy to find, getting hold of docs, DSes etc with the right level of experience and no history could be difficult due to so many of them working during the EPO era, as even noted clean guys have jots to join - the thread about Moncoutié was derailed almost from the word go because somebody saw a Cofidis jersey and didn't recognise Moncoutié, and likewise Bassons rode for Festina - both teams that have been embroiled in scandal), but in return those on the inside should forgive us our skepticism even if they don't like the (often too inelegant) way it's expressed.
After all, in a sport with a history of cheating such as cycling has, perhaps in calmer moments JV can look at our more aggro moments in the Clinic and see it as a compliment when he or his guys are mentioned. After all, Garmin are a purportedly clean team, the only REAL dots to join pertain to riders' histories before they came TO the team, and if they're doing well enough that people can't believe they're doing it clean, then it's surely validation of those guys' talent and JV's ability to spot them.