gingerwallaceafro said:
Probably doesn't like being accused of doping I'd of thought. Funny that innit?
While this is true, he has been happy to praise Armstrong and draw comparisons to US Postal in the past. When people draw those same comparisons, but from a more negative standpoint (i.e. suggesting that as well as the good side of those comparisons he also shares the bad) he throws a fit. Don't invite the comparisons if you don't want people to make them.
Also, I would find it unbelievable if Sky hadn't prepared for the eventuality of being questioned, simply because they aren't total morons. Froome reminded us that we ought to just get used to that the péloton has changed and clean cyclists can dominate. He was roundly told that the péloton ought to just get used to that fans have been being lied to for a quarter of a century and so we aren't capable of showing the blind faith he's expecting of us anymore.
Five years ago, Wiggins said that he knew there was the perception amongst the media of cycling being full of doping, and there were always questions raised about those that won big, and he understood and accepted that. Well, now he's winning big, and those questions are still there. But he's no longer understanding or accepting now that, rather than somebody else, it's HIM the questions are being asked of. His integrity is being impeached, perhaps he expected us to stand and applaud when the lights tell us to and continue to lap up the promotional material like we need to be told how to react. One, two, three, jump. One, two, three, jump.
A lot of fans grew sick of the USPS domination era and were glad to be rid of it. The race was more open, more people could win, and there wasn't the groan of annoyance as a dominant train put man after man out the back whilst still having several domestiques in attendance, crushing unpredictability and competition under its iron grip. And at least the USPS train only rocked up like that once a year. The rest of the year we were free of it. The Sky train has been strangling the life out of races all year long. If fans believed what Sky was doing, many of them would still be bored by it. But many of us aren't buying what Sky are selling, so not only are we bored by it, we are repulsed by it, as it takes us back to those bad old days we'd rather forget. We endured those, and we thought cycling was getting through the worst of it. We sat like gormless idiots and took it. We defended the sport against the attacks of those who knew nothing of it - those who praise the likes of Barcelona and Real Madrid yet attack cycling for being dope-addled. We defended our interest in the sport, we parroted the lines about no sport doing more to clean up its act, we sat by and gave the promotional spiel about how the old days were slowly dying off. We fans, just like Óscar Pereiro said of the péloton he was part of, well, "somos tontos". And just when we thought things were looking up, we get this.
Why continue to tell people about loving the sport when you no longer believe what you're saying?