Nigel - One of my best friends is an MD/Ph.D working in genetics. Mrs. Alpe went through a year of organic chemistry, plus a year of bio, and biochem, and was pre-med at one point (actually, pre-vet to be honest*). Her best friend is a nurse with a degree in bio, and a lot of A&P studies including hematology. I'm also over 40 and have a good career already. Being fascinated with how this applies to our sport doesn't mean I should go to medical school and stay silent. It's a web forum for goodness sakes!
I don't think there is quite the team administered doping there was 5 years ago, I think what we're seeing now is more like Kohl's description of Lotto, or atmospheres of comfort of doping and looking the other way like what's happened at Quickstep, Rabo, etc. I've cynically stated in the past that some teams anti-doping programs are to make sure the athletes don't pee + at controls. I'm not literally saying that in 2009 teams are doping their riders all with this in mind. But I do believe that some teams, perhaps those I, and you others have mentioned, turn a blind eye and have that in mind at their controls, that it's possible.
That said, enough of the tide may be turning to where what happened to him won't be the norm. There is such backlash against dopers, and acceptance of those that confess, and we are seeing more riders speak out against doping, that enough of a fissure in the omerta is opening to make it more plausible.
*FYI, did you know you can buy drugs for animals/pets that are the same exact medicine as they are for humans, but when purchasing for humans you need a physician's prescription?
Yes, he can. At that level, there's no other way. Just a handful of special helpers, well paid, and some very quiet help, and it's a very, very tight circle. But keep in mind, Lance isn't the only one.FoxxyBrown1111 said:If Contador dont make that 19 seconds on friday something is REAL WRONG with Epo-Lance (saw him on giro, he coulld not keep up with the leaders on any hills after Stage 4). So what you pipo think he is using, since Epo is no more "safe" and blood doping takes too much of insiders who could speak out? Is Lance this strong to keep them ALL quiet?
I don't think there is quite the team administered doping there was 5 years ago, I think what we're seeing now is more like Kohl's description of Lotto, or atmospheres of comfort of doping and looking the other way like what's happened at Quickstep, Rabo, etc. I've cynically stated in the past that some teams anti-doping programs are to make sure the athletes don't pee + at controls. I'm not literally saying that in 2009 teams are doping their riders all with this in mind. But I do believe that some teams, perhaps those I, and you others have mentioned, turn a blind eye and have that in mind at their controls, that it's possible.
Maybe. Remember, Joe tried it, and no one seemed to care, though it did help sink Leogrande, that wasn't the key bit. Joe actually took a much bigger beating, even from amateurs and rec cyclists, than any interest from even officials in what he was uncovering.BroDeal said:Taking up what Alpe mentioned, I think it is only a matter of time before someone decides that if he is going down then he'll take a lot of others with him. Cell phones, cameras, and digital recording devices are so small and ubiquitous these days, it would be easy to gather the info.
That said, enough of the tide may be turning to where what happened to him won't be the norm. There is such backlash against dopers, and acceptance of those that confess, and we are seeing more riders speak out against doping, that enough of a fissure in the omerta is opening to make it more plausible.
*FYI, did you know you can buy drugs for animals/pets that are the same exact medicine as they are for humans, but when purchasing for humans you need a physician's prescription?