Think that's sort of the point, though - again, hypothetically of course, if a French athlete competing in a US sports league were caught doping, blamed the (US) lab that produced the positive and claimed that it was all a big American conspiracy to prevent a French athlete from excelling at a US sport, that the American lab was incompetent, etc, and then his/her lawyer hired someone to hack into the American lab, stole documents, and then falsified the documents, I'm pretty sure no American would say, "ah, the guys been through enough, leave him be". On the contrary, I doubt many Americans would have a problem with said individual and his lawyer being issued a warrant for questioning regarding the hacking and stealing of private documents. Don't really see why it would be any different for Landis and Baker being issued arrest warrants by the French - an American judge would've done exactly same thing if the hypothetical above were the case.