The Annecy TT was hilly, this one isn't.Ryo Hazuki said:that was 40 km. make that 50 and andy needs at least 2 minutes to be in contention for winning the tour.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The Annecy TT was hilly, this one isn't.Ryo Hazuki said:that was 40 km. make that 50 and andy needs at least 2 minutes to be in contention for winning the tour.
Ryo Hazuki said:last years final 40 km itt
1 Alberto Contador Velasco (Spa) Astana 0:48:31
21 Andy Schleck (Lux) Team Saxo Bank 0:01:44
Eyeballs Out said:I am aware of last year's result and the mistake people are making in assuming that Contador 2009 = Contador 2010 and Schleck 2009 = Schleck 2010
What that result does prove is you can throw the formbook out of the window as I said. How else can Contador beat arguably the greatest TT specialist of all time ?
Which makes it even better for Contador.killswitch said:The Annecy TT was hilly, this one isn't.
Eyeballs Out said:I am aware of last year's result and the mistake people are making in assuming that Contador 2009 = Contador 2010 and Schleck 2009 = Schleck 2010
What that result does prove is you can throw the formbook out of the window as I said. How else can Contador beat arguably the greatest TT specialist of all time ?
That was his point, yes.El Pistolero said:I assume you mean Cancellara. Cancellara was probably tired already from all the climbing stages. And he clearly doesn't recuperate quite as well as Contador after 2 weeks of racing.
El Pistolero said:I assume you mean Cancellara. Cancellara was probably tired already from all the climbing stages. And he clearly doesn't recuperate quite as well as Contador after 2 weeks of racing.
Eyeballs Out said:Exactly. The mountains are a great leveller
Schleck is becoming a strong rider on the flat - you only have to see what happened on the cobbles. You have to have a good engine to finish with the group he finished with that day. Who really knows what he's capable of in a long TT now with an extra year to have worked on his TT ?
Eyeballs Out said:Exactly. The mountains are a great leveller
Schleck is becoming a strong rider on the flat - you only have to see what happened on the cobbles. You have to have a good engine to finish with the group he finished with that day. Who really knows what he's capable of in a long TT now with an extra year to have worked on his TT ?
Ryo Hazuki said:and contador hasn't worked on his itt?? contador was an itt specialist from the time he was a junior. andy never was.
theyoungest said:1+1= Contador crushes Andy on the Tourmalet
roundabout said:God, not the Contador was a specialist shyt again.
therhodeo said:Berto, Bertie, Alberto, all ok. Calling him "El Pistolero" everytime you refer to him makes you seem a bit obsessed.
Eyeballs Out said:I am aware of last year's result and the mistake people are making in assuming that Contador 2009 = Contador 2010 and Schleck 2009 = Schleck 2010
What that result does prove is you can throw the formbook out of the window as I said. How else can Contador beat arguably the greatest TT specialist of all time ?
Eyeballs Out said:Exactly. The mountains are a great leveller
Schleck is becoming a strong rider on the flat - you only have to see what happened on the cobbles. You have to have a good engine to finish with the group he finished with that day. Who really knows what he's capable of in a long TT now with an extra year to have worked on his TT ?
Ryaguas said:LOL
Well as everybody has said the pressure is on Andy cuz he needs more time for the final TT... He is playing a terrible and risky game not attacking and trying to put more time on El Pistolero...
Today We saw 3 attacks from El Pistolero, none from Andy... that leave a lot of possibilities to take...
1. Andy didn't has the legs to attack he was gone and was just following AC's wheel.
2. He was good but didn't want to take risk cuz this climb didn't suit him.
3. Andy wasn't good but was playing mind games no attacking...
4. El Pistolero was really good (as Andy said) but was playing mind games too waiting for Andy's attack for then counterattack and make Andy crack big time.
5.El Pistolero wasn't good, he tried to attack but as he didn't has the legs he just sat and marked Andy.
6. I dunno other option
If Andy is waiting for La Col du Tourmalet to attack he is crazy... he will never beat El Pistolero in Le Tourmalet also this is his favorite climb and is where he is going to full attack like he did in Verbier last year...
This attack in La Col du Tourmalet will be soooooo faking great that will be remembered for centuries haha
"The tactic for today was that I would stick on his wheel. I don't like the last climb too much as it is a bit similar to the one in Mende. It was clear that I should not pass him because he would have attacked me and again gain seconds on me," Schleck said.
Schleck knows that with the 52km-long time trial in Bordeaux heavily in Contador's favor, he cannot keep up the same tactics through the rest of the mountain stages.
The fifteenth stage to Bagnères-de-Luchon on Monday features another Hors Categorie climb, the Port de Balès, and according to Schleck that climb could be the time to go 'all-in'. At 19.3 kilometres, it's a long enough climb to do damage, although the first half is a relatively gentle gradient.
"Tomorrow it's different and I might go 'all in' because I have to take time back on him," Schleck said.
Publicus said:There was a Cat 3 climb in the middle of the course, at which point AC held a 46" advantage over Cancellara. He won by 3". If the course had been a 100 meters longer, he would have finished second.
ozymandias said:Also, if I recall, Cancellara was upset that he lost, because he believed Contador gained some time at the end by drafting behind a car.
Publicus said:Here's your answer from the horse's mouth (pun intended):
Ryaguas said:I read the article don't worry... I want to know what is REALLY happening... not just polite declarations... as I heard once from an spanish friend "El puede decir misa pero es no es necesariamente verdad" in english would be something like "He can say anything he want but that is not necessarily true"...
I want the truth... WTH is happening... who has better legs? who was playing mind games and who was almost cracked?
I've been seeing the replay and AC was making faces... He wasn't good...? that was real or he was giving a reason to Andy to attack to then make an "all in" attack?