Doing a slow time does not mean the level is automatically low. But doing record pace does automatically mean the level is high.If we're gonna go by that metric then we can confidently dismiss Froome's Finestre raid cause it was the slowest Finestre, the slowest Sestriere and the slowest Jafferau we've seen and conclude that Froome wasn't even impressive but his opponents were just that terrible.
I think measuring riders in their own time and era is more useful than measuring riders a decade apart.
Or, to put it another way... Carl Lewis ran a 9,92 in the 100m at Seoul, a then-World Record. Ben Johnson ran 9,79, so won by 0,13 seconds, a vast, yawning chasm in the 100m. The fact that 100m running was by and large faster in 1988 than it had been in 1978 does not make Ben Johnson's opposition "at a low level" because he won by such a clear margin, because Lewis still ran a World Record pace.
Last edited: