good point, probably.The Hitch said:Why link it and give it extra traffic then?
No one asked him to lie. But after his good work previously on riders non related to Sky he has had no problem making judgements and calling out riders without doping positives.FoxxyBrown1111 said:He didn´t. Just told what he saw. He can´t lie only to please the clinic. I thought this would be clear.
he implied it (which i think is what hrotha alludes to) with the impressive argument that doping at grand tours is logistically more complex than at the classics.Dazed and Confused said:Did he already? Must have missed it.
Sounds like we are running a bit empty on the arguments then.
3 weeks before xmas, that can't be good.
ah right, but why the soft approach? Just go for it: Passapotador, Nutella, tailwind, detective work and dopers at the classics.sniper said:he implied it (which i think is what hrotha alludes to) with the impressive argument that doping at grand tours is logistically more complex than at the classics.
Walsh now knows for a FACT, that Froome is clean. "He is clean"."It will be chip, chip, chip away and knock little bits off the scepticism that people feel. I think it will be helpful for the sport if Chris Froome wins it again. And say to people that this guy is bit of a freakish talent, he has a talent for climbing mountains, he is pretty good against the clock and he is clean."
Froome said it but didnt give a reason, just said it for headlines.the sceptic said:Hitch you must have missed the interview where Froome says he wants to win it again because it would be more credible for the new clean post doping era.
I think what Walsh is saying is the following;The Hitch said:Apparently in the podcast sniper linked Walsh said this which absolutely takes the cake and beats anything he ever said for pure stupidity.
Walsh now knows for a FACT, that Froome is clean. "He is clean".
But the bit before is what truly shocks. Froome winning it multiple times will show that he is clean?
Didn't Armstrong, Contador, Indurain, win the Tour multiple times?
I'm due to write Froome biography next year and what could be better than another win?! With the SDS and Inside Sky selling well despite the numerous errors, I'd on a winner if a Chris takes another title! and then my book is released shortly after! I'll put a down payment on the holiday in the Bahamas right away.
Double points in the final round next year. Maybe Amaury could dish out an hour bonus for the sprint win in Paris, would make things very exciting.roundabout said:F1 technical regulations are 78 pages long.
http://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/regulation/file/2013 F1TECHNICAL REGULATIONS - PUBLISHED ON 04.07.2013.pdf
Don't forget that Hamilton told him that Fabian is Luigi and therefore 100% doper confirmed.sniper said:he implied it (which i think is what hrotha alludes to) with the impressive argument that doping at grand tours is logistically more complex than at the classics.