thehog said:
WADA's reasoned decision on Froome's TUE, you have a link to this?
No I don't, mainly because, no doubt, you have quoted out of context since a 'reasoned decision' would be something that would go against the riders position (if they were in agreement why would they issue a 'reasoned decision'). And, as you have quoted above, it would be communicated to the rider in question.
So, again,
another deflection / irrelevant post - since if there was one we would never see it, unless of course it was leaked.
Why not just answer the question I asked - how did
you come to the conclusion it wasn't reviewed. Its quite simple - just tell me how. What facts / information did you consider?