thehog
BANNED
ebandit said:Good....that is what TUES are for.....enabling athletes to get back to their natural form
Mark L
In one day? Beating Tony Martin? Umm ok
Looking for the latest race results? - We got you covered right here!
ebandit said:Good....that is what TUES are for.....enabling athletes to get back to their natural form
Mark L
thehog said:So Froome is near an infants age? Got itbut hasn't got it.
ummm ok, relevancy?![]()
ebandit said:Good....that is what TUES are for.....enabling athletes to get back to their natural form
Scep and Hog....both angry because cough medicine works
Mark L
thehog said:Mark L said it was reviewed, did he not? I've not seen the reasoned decision. I'd like to see it, wouldn't you?
TheSpud said:Well, as I said, I don't expect there to be a RD unless it goes against the fed / rider. Why would there be? And even if there was, why would we see it. WADA made a statement - it was reported on CyclingNews. Are you saying you now don't believe anything reported on the internet?
8.10 WADA shall communicate the reasoned decision of the WADA TUEC promptly to the Athlete and to his/her National Anti-Doping Organization and International Federation (and, if applicable, the Major Event Organization).
the sceptic said:Sure Mark. FRoome went from being so sick that he had to call for an emergency TUE to totally healthy just like that.
I know logic is hard for sky fans, but you are really going off the deep end on this one.
thehog said:You don't expect?
I've checked 8.10, doesn't say anything with respect to only publishing if goes against fed / rider.
Are you saying you don't believe anything published by WADA?
![]()
TheSpud said:Another deflection - I never once said Froome is near an infants age. You are the one who started pulling out the kids illnesses. Why don't you just face it - I quoted a page that had 3 reasons why and adult may take Prednisolone:
1 - MS. Froome doesn't have this AFAIK
2 - BD. I said this sounded the nearest to what he might have
3 - Anti-inflammatory. Maybe this is what he had - inflammation of the lungs / chest?
Two of those could be what Froome was treated for. I quoted the dosage for #2, and oh look - the dosage for #3 is between 5 and 60mg / day. In line with what he took.
thehog said:"Could", "maybe", "never said". Very good. Remind me not to go see you next time I'm sick![]()
TheSpud said:You're right - 8.10 doesn't say that, but 8.9 does. As usual Hog you're quoting out of context:
If you read the whole of section 8 its quite clear that 8.10 follows from 8.9 - its how official documents work.
thehog said:"Could", "maybe", "never said". Very good. Remind me not to go see you next time I'm sick![]()
the sceptic said:Looks like Martin is back to his old tricks of making threads unbearable.
Think I'll leave until it gets sorted out by the mods.
thehog said:Its late as well. So you know what that means...
ebandit said:The medicine made him better, Scep, that is why he took it.
Mark L
ebandit said:Good....that is what TUES are for.....enabling athletes to get back to their natural form
Scep and Hog....both angry because cough medicine works
Mark L
TheSpud said:I believe Froome was prescribed 40mg of Pred (per day probably) which is nearer the upper end of the usual dosage for a human (based on easily researchable information). So, about 0.66mg per Kg (based on Froome being 66Kg) - not exactly out of range for body size.
Froome was permitted to take up to 40mg of the drug a day in tablet form after Team Sky doctor Alan Farrell was given the go ahead by UCI medical director Mario Zorzoli.
peloton said:Is this the Walsh thread?
TheSpud said:What? Its dark outside??
the sceptic said:Looks like Martin is back to his old tricks of making threads unbearable.
Think I'll leave until it gets sorted out by the mods.
thehog said:Yes, noted. Martin back again. Its late as well. So you know what that means...
thehog said:It was until whiskey nighty posting took over![]()
where moderators fear to tread, apparantly.peloton said:Is this the Walsh thread?
ebandit said:.....has anybody else spotted the huge irony in the discussion of Froome's TUE given the context of this thread?????
Mark L
TheSpud said:You mean the fact that Walsh questioned Skys ethics when the TUE was leaked?
Not lost on me at all.
TheSpud said:You mean the fact that Walsh questioned Skys ethics when the TUE was leaked?
Not lost on me at all.
Paywall (of silence?) here:sniper said:does anybody have a link to the full article? (not just the snippets reproduced in other media)