So as I understand the last few pages, Walsh is neutral on sky because after 2 years of comparing them to Jesus, holding them up as the model of perfection and absolutely everything that is good about mankind, downplaying their doubters as the embodiment of everything that is wrong with mankind, and taking every single word that comes out of braiksfords mouth as the word of god, which requires no further research, even when brailsford is talking about things he can't actually know (e.g. other teams don't train hard). After 2 years of that he writes one sentence saying they may have been mildly dishonest on some minor issue, but they are still clean and those who doubt them still the devils army, that makes him neutral?
Even the sky fans can't actually defend the religious heroworship towards sky Walshs books contain and the clear as day factual mistakes / lies that appear on page after page after page. If you can try going at it with hoh and his army of quotations from the book.
Making any kind of a deal out of Walsh finally writing one bad thing about sky, in the face of all of that, is ridiculous. It's lime finding one quotation from ligget that doesn't praise lance and arguing that it meant liggett was never biased towards lance.