sniper said:big fail.
the lequipe thing was in the summarized part that i had in fact read.
if you know my history of posting you know i'm not too stubborn or proud to say i missed something (unlike a certain doc here).
while i've missed a lot, in this case i hadn't missed anything.
i meant what i say i meant. wanna respond to that? had walsh read the lequipe article when it came out? or only after uci's letter to JTL?
You admitted you didn't read the article. All this shows is you have a preconceived stance on Walsh without reading his articles first on all this. A bit of a hint, it's a good idea to throw away the shovel now.