I can give a brief summary: He starts saying that Lance is in a similar situation to the one he was in (after testing positive), weighed his options for the future, and saw that the only way forward was to come clean. He then says that doping isn't only prevalent in cycling, but if the light was shone on other sports stars, there would be few top athletes in any discipline who would be found to be clean. He says that if we want to be serious about fighting doping, we need tougher deterrents, not just bans from sports, but prison sentences. When the topic returns to Armstrong, he says that he isn't disappointed in Lance, and agrees with Jan Ullrich's statement, that Lance is still an amazing cyclist because he was able to win the Tour seven times. As to his own situation, he's happy, has just opened a large bike shop, and confessing was a good decision. To the question whether he, Kohl, would have made it in sports without doping, his answer is: "No way."