The article is quite clear for those who can read it, and it doesn't say what you claimed it did.What have you corrected that was false? The article literally says they used the now banned practice and posted pictures of the athletes. How was I supposed to know that the subtitle to the photo saying that this was "the legal" inhalation practice shown here... It was missed non-intentionally by me, but that's also obviously what they would say now isn't it??
The study was done in the summer of 2023, the picture of Staune-Mittet is from 2022.
Last edited: