It seems that he has returned to a standard post-mutation level like G. Thomas.
I've always thought he was a new Froome, going from domestique to Tour winner. At 24, he could barely achieve top 72 at Romandie

and a top 10 in Poland, and when Roglic failed in his Tour de France bid, Vingegaard (Froome) replaced Roglic (Wiggins). In a few months, he went from a domestique to second in the Tour, performing at a similar level to Carapaz's,. The following year he demolished the Tour winner.
But with Sky's decline in performance, Froome reverted to his mediocre roots. I'm only seeing Froome's decline in Jakobsen (Lefevere's miracles, also with Gaviria, or Alvaro Hodeg looked like a top-level sprinter).
Now I compare him to Geraint Thomas. Geraint Thomas suddenly became a rider capable of competing in Tour de France, but unlike what has happened to Froome, despite Sky´s decline, G. maintained his post-mutation level in Grand Tour, almost beating Roglic in Giro d'Italia and reaching the podium at 38 in 2024.
It seems that for some, like Froome, the effect wears off completely, but for others, like Thomas or Vingegaard, whatever they were given to transform themselves leaves a permanent mark.
Of course, Thomas was mutated for Grand Tours, but he was a better cyclist than Vingegaard, who went from being absolutely nobody to winning two Tours de France and he is cloes to win all 3 Gran Tours and all 7 one week races.
At least he was a good domestique. Froome's case is the great enigma of this sport, but Majka was possibly a better domestique and cyclist than Vingegaard, and they didn't transform him into a Tour de France winner, not even to give him a Vuelta like they did with Kuss. (Visma lost his mind during those years, making Kuss Grand Tour winner or Tobias Foss world champion).
Vingegaard is the guy with the strangest transformation since Froome, and this is just a few pages long.
That has been Visma's great triumph. The narrative that Vingegaard doped and improved for two years has prevailed, not what actually happened, which was a complete mutation from nothing to a winner, the second rarest mutation in this sport.
Other cyclists have improved with doping, but Vingegaard is a guy who won two Tours de France when he was destined to be possibly a worse cyclist than Majka or similar to Kuss without victories in GC.
Even Lance Armstrong, before his transformation, was a better cyclist.
Without Vingegaard, Pogacar probably wouldn't be the rider he is today, but he would have won five Tours de France at a lower level without Vingegaard. Although Van der Poel wouldn't have improved that much in 2023 either, nor Pedersen last year. But that's the difference between cyclists who would have won—we don't know by how much—but the others who would have done absolutely nothing; they're the definition of a mutant, transforming into something they weren't. Not an improvement through doping.
At least Froome wasn't allowed to make history with a fifth Tour de France .and has suffered a shameful decline. Vingegaard is s going to win every stage race, something even Merckx never managed.
109
Jakob Fuglsang is the winner of Vuelta a Andalucia Ruta Ciclista Del Sol 2019, before Ion Izagirre and Steven Kruijswijk. The stage from Otura to Alhaurín de la Torre was won by Matteo Trentin.
www.procyclingstats.com
72
Primož RogliÄ is the winner of Tour de Romandie 2019, before Rui Costa and Geraint Thomas. The stage from Genève to Genève was won by Primož RogliÄ.
www.procyclingstats.com
22 in national ITT
National Championships Denmark ME - ITT 2019 was won by Kasper Asgreen before Martin Toft Madsen and Johan Price-Pejtersen.
www.procyclingstats.com
His best Achivement, 8 in Tour of Poland. One year later second in a Tour because of Roglic absence.
Remco Evenepoel is the winner of Tour de Pologne 2020, before Jakob Fuglsang and Simon Yates. The stage from Zakopane to Kraków was won by Davide Ballerini.
www.procyclingstats.com