Jonas Vingegaard: Something is Rotten

Page 84 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 19, 2010
774
234
10,380
Just came by looking if this is still the thread where Pogi fans let of steam trying to cope with the outcome of this year's TdF. Yes, it is.

(No worries, I think the Pogi clinic thread would explode the same if it was the other way around. Hypocrisy on both sides.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChewbaccaDefense
Just came by looking if this is still the thread where Pogi fans let of steam trying to cope with the outcome of this year's TdF. Yes, it is.

(No worries, I think the Pogi clinic thread would explode the same if it was the other way around. Hypocrisy on both sides.)
Why do you believe that people complaining here aren't also complaining about pogie?
 
Jul 16, 2015
5,374
13,954
23,180
Pogacar rode 39 km/h average. That's 1 km/h faster than the Planche des Belles Filles TT, which you will call "rolling" as well of course. Disregarding the huge climb at the end. For comparison: the last Basque prologue that Roglic won, he rode 48 km/h average. That one did indeed have a little ramp at the end. Nowhere close to what we saw on Tuesday though.

The reason a bike change wasn't necessary is that a large part of the climb wasn't that steep. But it was a climb nonetheless. Are you really incapable of seeing nuance?

Straight off the bat, there's nothing inherently wrong with your opinion. It's just cycling & all this stuff until proven otherwise is up for debate, i.e. there's no right or wrong answer. So I'm not going to sit here & act huffy when you prod me with big bad words like 'nuance'.

But, those comparisons between ITT's you mentioned aren't an exact science. Irrespective of the route profile (i.e. mountainous), LPDBF was 36km with a 6km climb. I haven't checked but I reckon the Itzulia ITT prologue Rogla won was much, much shorter. And stage 16 of this TdF 2023 was also a relatively short ITT... which makes the massive gaps something which simply cannot be overlooked, or downplayed.

There's a reason such seconds per km differences haven't been seen since the 1960's. It was neither long enough nor mountainous enough to warrant such enormous time gaps. It's an outlier, aka a statistical anomaly... in a sport where such anomalies invariably lead to one conclusion only: clinical enhancement.

I don't make the rules. Just ask Froome fans, i.e. a rider who went from being a paragon of the "muh cleanz cycling" renewal of the sport in the 2010's to now chilling out on Lance Armstrong's podcast. These dudes all share a common trait: they know what it really takes to win.
 
Aug 13, 2011
7,887
12,054
23,180
damn hes got froome arms

that needle mark could just be from doping tests though
Do they do illicit drug tests venously? Usually it’s urine, saliva, sweat, or hair follicles because that lasts longer while venous would be out of the system. It could be a CBC and metabolic panel to see if any doping was involved from previous levels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 46&twoWheels
Dec 2, 2020
2,037
2,936
11,180
Do they do illicit drug tests venously? Usually it’s urine, saliva, sweat, or hair follicles because that lasts longer while venous would be out of the system. It could be a CBC and metabolic panel to see if any doping was involved from previous levels.
Does urine/saliva etc hold the same compounds as blood? I also thought it’s mostly urine tests but aren’t there a lot of things more detectable in blood?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DenisMenchov
Feb 8, 2023
776
1,544
6,180
Do they do illicit drug tests venously? Usually it’s urine, saliva, sweat, or hair follicles because that lasts longer while venous would be out of the system. It could be a CBC and metabolic panel to see if any doping was involved from previous levels.
I’m assuming it must be something to do with anti-doping, I don’t believe they would just let him walk around with that visible mark on his arm otherwise, regardless of what it was for
 
Aug 13, 2011
7,887
12,054
23,180
Does urine/saliva etc hold the same compounds as blood? I also thought it’s mostly urine tests but aren’t there a lot of things more detectable in blood?
Usually it leaves the blood fast, that’s why they do urine or the others. That’s why a said maybe it’s CBC and BMP to see how his body is functioning total, and that you can’t get from urine. Which by definition would be anti doping but just seeing Vinge’s lab values to see if they’re in the normal ranges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 46&twoWheels
Oct 2, 2020
2,486
4,513
12,180
I'm about 90% certain lats from doping tests.

I'm pretty sure they would be testing his blood along with everything else.
Yes. Wouldn't a blood sample be needed for hematocrit testing? Just asking ... I have no idea about the protocols.
 

ManicJack

BANNED
Apr 4, 2023
1,253
1,632
5,680
If the last few days of this thread aren't reason enough to quit commenting on the internet, I don't know what is. It's worse than 2010.
 
Jul 11, 2022
172
241
2,230
At this time it's just a circle jerk with the same small group of people trying to cope with Vingo winning the tour. I mean, the attempts on being funny in this thread are horribly below par. I had higher expectations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ManicJack
Mar 19, 2009
3,551
3,720
19,180
At this time it's just a circle jerk with the same small group of people trying to cope with Vingo winning the tour. I mean, the attempts on being funny in this thread are horribly below par. I had higher expectations.

I don't get you, why has all doubt torwards Vingegaard and the state of the peloton in general have to be based on having coping issues? Like Gall today apparently did 6,83 w/kg for 19:20. That's normal now. I mean if your take is: there nothing to see here, what exactly is the point of complaining here?
 
May 5, 2009
1,905
443
11,580
Does urine/saliva etc hold the same compounds as blood? I also thought it’s mostly urine tests but aren’t there a lot of things more detectable in blood?

And where do you think urine comes from?!

You need blood to function properly, that's why blood is "more pure", cleans up faster, but toxins and other unnatural stuff go to urine FROM blood. That's why urine is a better option for tests.
 

Latest posts