• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders Jonas Vingegaard thread: Love in Iberia

Page 304 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
You cannot both be racing each other and not chasing each other.
At that point the situation was as I explained a few posts ago. Basically Rog thought there is no need to attack and just by following the others he would slowly regain the time to Kuss and win the Vuelta.
Alas Jonas did not care about the team and his teammates and so it happened.
That's not true. They were clearly stronger than everyone else. If others would be dropped they could just fight it out. But I get what you are saying though. Basically Vingegaard was the first to take advantage of the situation, which were team orders demanded by Roglic, and Roglic was sad he didn't attack first.
 
That's not true. They were clearly stronger than everyone else. If others would be dropped they could just fight it out. But I get what you are saying though. Basically Vingegaard was the first to take advantage of the situation, which were team orders demanded by Roglic, and Roglic was sad he didn't attack first.
It is very simple. Rog did not chase after Vinge on Tourmalet. Draw your own conclusion why that was the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: acm
It is very simple. Rog did not chase after Vinge on Tourmalet. Draw your own conclusion why that was the case.
Because he didn't want to chase after a teammate with others in his wheel. Eventually Kuss did went after Vingegaard (twice) when he had the feeling he could drop everyone. Which he did btw. I think Roglic could've attacked and went after Vingegaard, you just need to make sure that you aren't taking others with you.

That's when Roglic understood, I need to be the first to attack if I want to win this thing. Otherwise I'm stuck with others. Which is why he attacked first on Angliru.
 
Because he didn't want to chase after a teammate with others in his wheel. Eventually Kuss did went after Vingegaard (twice) when he had the feeling he could drop everyone. Which he did btw. I think Roglic could've attacked and went after Vingegaard, you just need to make sure that you aren't taking others with you.

That's when Roglic understood, I need to be the first to attack if I want to win this thing. Otherwise I'm stuck with others. Which is why he attacked first on Angliru.
OK, that means Rog was respecting the team and not chasing after his teammate whilst Vingo had no such qualms and attacked his team unrepentantly. All the while there was an agreement within the team that they would set up Rog for a sprint at the top (as per Kuss's statements). I guess there is nothing more to say/write regarding this. Everyone can draw his/her conclusions. I thought Vingo's actions were very bad for the team (Rog is elsewhere, Kuss is nowhere) but I also thought it was good for the sport. Vingo's comments and behavior after the stage was, however, despicable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: acm
Because he didn't want to chase after a teammate with others in his wheel. Eventually Kuss did went after Vingegaard (twice) when he had the feeling he could drop everyone. Which he did btw. I think Roglic could've attacked and went after Vingegaard, you just need to make sure that you aren't taking others with you.
And yet that's exactly what Hansen did on Angliru, bringing Mas with him.
 
I don't believe Roglic couldn't do better than what he did.
I don't think he could do much better on Tourmalet. Had Vingegaard been chained on Bejes and Rogla won the stage, he'd still only have had a lead of 17" over Vingegaard before Angliru and Cruz de Linares.
And yet that's exactly what Hansen did on Angliru, bringing Mas with him.
Vingegaard never pulled on Angliru, he stayed behind Kuss and later Rogla.
 
I don't think he could do much better on Tourmalet. Had Vingegaard been chained on Bejes and Rogla won the stage, he'd still only have had a lead of 17" over Vingegaard before Angliru and Cruz de Linares.

Vingegaard never pulled on Angliru, he stayed behind Kuss and later Rogla.

Without the Bejes ***, I think Kuss could have defended his lead if the others only attacked him on the uphill finishes.
I understand you are a fan of Jonas, but if you truly believe Rog could not do better on the Tourmalet stage then you do not understand cycling and have zero capacity for analysis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK, that means Rog was respecting the team and not chasing after his teammate whilst Vingo had no such qualms and attacked his team unrepentantly. All the while there was an agreement within the team that they would set up Rog for a sprint at the top (as per Kuss's statements). I guess there is nothing more to say/write regarding this. Everyone can draw his/her conclusions. I thought Vingo's actions were very bad for the team (Rog is elsewhere, Kuss is nowhere) but I also thought it was good for the sport. Vingo's comments and behavior after the stage was, however, despicable.
They said they can fight it out on the road, but you don't ride against your own team. So Vingegaard attacked, and Roglic didn't because others would have followed. Just like you saw Kuss do attack when he was able to drop others. What was holding Roglic back to attack if Kuss already went after Vingegaard? Maybe he just wasn't good enough that day.
 
They said they can fight it out on the road, but you don't ride against your own team. So Vingegaard attacked, and Roglic didn't because others would have followed. Just like you saw Kuss do attack when he was able to drop others. What was holding Roglic back to attack if Kuss already went after Vingegaard? Maybe he just wasn't good enough that day.
It is pretty obvious Rog did not want to chase Vingo. The plan before the start of the stage was for the whole team to bring Rog to 500m and for Rog to sprint for victory. The fighting it out on the road and all the drama was after the stage.
Remember also that Rog was denied a spot on the Tour team and he was told he would be going for the win at the Vuelta. Therefore, I guess he thought there was no need to fight against teammates since that was settled before the race.
 
It is pretty obvious Rog did not want to chase Vingo. The plan before the start of the stage was for the whole team to bring Rog to 500m and for Rog to sprint for victory. The fighting it out on the road and all the drama was after the stage.
Remember also that Rog was denied a spot on the Tour team and he was told he would be going for the win at the Vuelta. Therefore, I guess he thought there was no need to fight against teammates since that was settled before the race.
In that case it was a *** move by Vingegaard, and I don’t understand why Roglic didn’t went after him. Even more so since Kuss already tried and Vingegaard also went after Roglic in stage 6.
 
I'm not commenting the politics of who backstabbed who on what stage, but Jonas was clearly the strongest in 2023 Vuelta and roglic would not gain the time on tourmalet or bejes like vinegardd did. Roglic could barely drop ujtedbrockes in tourmalet.

I am not saying vinegardd did the right thing with his attacks. I find roglic more likable than Jonas and wish roglic won that Vuelta (if I had to pick a Visma rider to win). But with his defensive and reactive tactics roglic put himself in a position where he is vulnerable to attack by a stronger, more proactive teammate. Again, the morality of this is a different dicussoon
 
  • Like
Reactions: Berniece