the sceptic said:
Ball not man Martin.
Im impressed that after so many posts and so much time spent in the clinic you are still "not sure"
How does sitting on the fence and being "not sure" about everything provide any value to the forum?
1. I'm glad your impressed, though i'm not sure that it matters what you are.
2. You call it sitting on the fence. I call it honesty. And what it provides is a helpful corrective to the misguided certainties of others who treat their hunches, and occasionally their biases, as some great repository of wisdom and knowledge.
Which you oddly seem to resent, based on a number of your posts to or about me.
You once wrote something on the lines that something alleged did not need to be "100% true" to be an "enjoyable reading experience".
I just can't get my head around the idea that as long as the lie is fun, it's ok. After all, is that not how cycling ended up here - not 100% true, but an "enjoyable viewing experience"?
The truth matters. It really does. Hell, this forum wouldn't even exist at all without the basic impulse to 'uncover' the truth about doping in cycling.
But sometimes the truth, genuinely is, "we don't know" - "we don't have the info yet" - "we'll have to wait and see".
And i reserve the right to call bullsh!t when other don't have the patience, or the fairness, to face that truth.
Regardless of whether it's a "enjoyable viewing experience".