IMHO you do want Pedersen in the team, he is a big personality and i don't perceive him as all that selfish, he can even climb. I like Ciccone but i don't feel he will go for GC at the Tour 2026, he is more of a specialist for winning a stage. On what kind of relationship they will have with Skjelmose, that remains to be seen. Likely they will simply ride for themself until one comes on top. In terms of the Tour 2026. After the other can prove to be a valuable weapon for the team. All in all, worst case, they will be fighting on who is the favourite child and not the second favourite one, tough life.
As for Rogla and Remco i feel they will manage just fine. Currently it seems they chose separate schedules but at some point i feel that symbiosis has so many potential that even if there is currently some fear involved they can overcome that. If they will rather choose not to then individually they can both still win some. Lets not forget Rogla was offered support role and stage hunting for the Tour, that IMHO is an offer to decline, Remco wouldn't accept it either. So management need to do their part better also, support excellence.
At UAE Ayuso was a perfect scapegoat and majority just went with it as it suited them. At Lidl-Trek they are not good enough, to play such games in the first place. All in all they will be fine. At UAE it will be interesting to see on what happens when del Toro makes his move. It's bound to happen, appetite is too high not to do so.
You have multiple examples that knock the legs out from under your position. At Visma and Trek there was obvious, public insubordination, or maybe the teams owners and directors don't mind things like your riders criticizing your strategy at the TDF.
Maybe frustrated riders just venting. UAE is different, they had laid out what they wanted from Juan Ayuso, he didn't follow the rules and was emotional and temperamental and created a management problem.
Isaac Del Toro was( is) a dedicated soldier working towards team goals. Ayuso fell off his bike, was attacked by insects and UAE went with plan B, which was Del Toro. Fast forward, Del Toro has seized every opportunity and created others.
Isaac , humble, polite, soft spoken, loyal takes every opportunity to express teamwork and dedication towards the UAE goals, which are primarily to have strong, positive showing in every race, male or female.
UAE also doing everything possible to cement the legacy of Tadej Pogacar while wearing the team kit. You don't hear any UAE rider voice disagreement, discontent with UAE ..doesn't happen.
Juan Ayuso was never a scapegoat, he had long period to play as a teammate, good employee, but instead he voiced his opinions rather than team messaging.
Del Toro is somewhat unique , unlike Paul Seixas, Del Toro has a contract until 2029 with the team that is perceived to have financial headroom to sign elite ( expensive) riders.
Seixas is the hottest commodity in the sport and most observers, just assume that there is no bidding war, because few teams have money to make a lucrative offer. Ineos is rumored to have increased funding, Visma said to be fragile, Decathlon already playing the loyalty card, saying that they want Paul to stay if he believes in the vision, other teams like EF don't have money.
So the UCI has created the most bizarre situation , beyond comprehension. Riders sign contracts and if another team with more money comes and does a hostile takeover of a desired rider. UCI has created contracts worth toilet paper.
The idea that Del Toro could be approached by another team while obligated to UAE, is wrong on many levels,
UCI is creating a new norm and rider transfers will create another problem and the UCI can't solve any of the problems on their to do list.
Ayuso and Remco, Cian all moved to other teams with mutual agreement. If Decathlon or Israel Premier Tech want to honor the contract, there should be a mechanism at the UCI, not kick the issue to the court system in some country.. Ridiculous that rider contracts are worthless..
Your post is a perfect example, you write that things can happen based on the premise that the contract is not really legally binding and that teams with money make the rules.
Seixas is a bit different, his obligation to Decathlon is only until after 2027 ..will UAE wait a year? You see many comments about lopsided UAE with concentration of talent because of money, if UAE with the UCI blessing nab Paul Seixas away from another emerging team it sends a terrible message to everyone. If you are Van Rysel, Decathlon and your plan can be turned upside down on a whim ..ouch. Chilling message to sponsors, team owners, riders and race organizations.. If UAE signs Seixas, that means that someone will be left out of your race, UAE is not sending Seixas, Pogacar, Del Toro and Almedia to the same race.