DirtyWorks said:
Perfect example of a guy that is spending some time and energy on the idea that he's running a clean-ish team. The process described seems reasonable too. The rest of the UCI's public team management don't even bother.
Per the OTHER JV thread, if there's good fortunes at the Vuelta and a 'machine calibration' issue, he'll address it. Because, it's a machine calibration problem.
I realize that's entirely inconsistent, but, at least the guy is making noises like a clean-ish operation. You can't say that about the other teams. Well, at least the ones communicating in English.
his definition of a 'clean athlete' is laughable.
explains why he (says he) thinks the peloton is so clean now.
it's the definition of a rider flying below the radar (who might, but certainly needs not, be clean).
or, if you will, the definition of a rider with a decent program.
what is laudable about him coming in here to insult your intelligence talking about brad "100% clean" wiggins and froome's crazy adaptive physiology.
what is laudable about him spreading the message to who wants to hear it that you can win GTs clean now? it's (a) not true and (b) counterproductive. The only aim I can see is to try and convince the agnostics, convert the non-believers, and keep the sceptics at bay.
It's self-serving, which is very understandable, they all are self serving, but I don't see why he deserves any praise for the fact that he's putting in more effort than others to insult our intelligence.
I also wonder, how does he know what a 'bad' profile looks like if all his riders are clean and so are all the riders he's tested such as JTL, Contador.