Thoughtforfood said:
An independent press is a fanciful notion in all but the rarest of cases anymore. His criticism of CN is warranted and illuminating. If all "journalism" means here is "lets water down a watered down article from someone else and pretend we are a 'news' organization" then they are only part of the larger problem.
Indeed, but CN's conduct over the last few years has contributed to the problem.
It has acted a mouthpiece for the likes of Armstrong and the UCI.
It is clear where it stands on the doping issue. Omerta all the way. When Suh was busy spouting ******** at every opportunity, CN was there like an eager puppy ready to report it all.
When Landis blew the whistle CN hasn't wasted an opportunity to **** on him from a great height and to portray him in a negative light.
The likes of McQuaid, Millar, Wiggins etc are always given every opportunity to bad mouth Landis or anyone else who speaks out.
Here's the thing - we've been through Festina, Saiz, Puerto, USP/Disco, Greyhound, Phonak, and yet, CN never bothers to ask questions
before the event.
Lets take a team like HTC - a team whose performance raises more than a few eyebrows. Will CN take a critical view of them? No of course not because they are Uncle Pat's faves. And you know what, if the balloon goes up, we'll be back in the same position we are now because the likes of CN were too worried about losing those 'exclusive' interviews with Frodo, etc to look critically at the team. Just like CN wasn't willing to look at USP/Disco/Shack or the UCI critically because the spineless Benson didn't want to rock the boat.
The again, when your lead journalist is so emotionally under-developed that she thinks it is still 1950, we can't really expect anything else.
Cycling will never get any better until the journalists covering the sport grow a set.