- Jul 9, 2009
- 7,871
- 1,279
- 20,680
krebs303 said:I do but Granny isn't so keen on them.
That is just wrong, on oh so many levels.
I am posting from an iPod touch. I had the runs from eating a bad Vietnamese sandwich but I feel better now.
- Mar 16, 2009
- 19,482
- 2
- 0
Thoughtforfood said:
Again you draw false conclusions! The question of my existence has not even come up. All I have said is that from the fact that you are talking to yourself one cannot possibly infer my nonexistence, let alone the weaker fact that you are not talking to me. You are worried that your present experience with me is a mere hallucination. But how can you possibly expect to obtain reliable information from a being about his very existence when you suspect the nonexistence of the very same being? Because many children and primitives have a primal intuition which the likes of you have lost. Frankly, I think it would do you a lot of good to talk to a tree once in a while, even more good than talking to me! But we seem always to be getting sidetracked! For the last time, I would like us to try to come to an understanding. obviously one such possibility is that you and I are identical. For example, it may be that you are part of me, in which case you may be talking to that part of me which is you. Or I may be part of you, in which case you may be talking to that part of you which is me. Or again, you and I might partially overlap, in which case you may be talking to the intersection and hence talking both to you and to me. The only way your talking to yourself might seem to imply that you are not talking to me is if you and I were totally disjoint -- and even then, you could conceivably be talking to both of us.
- Mar 16, 2009
- 19,482
- 2
- 0
I am not being willful! I merely wish to point out that no answer I could give could possibly satisfy you. All right, suppose I said, "No, I don't exist." What would that prove? Absolutely nothing! Or if I said, "Yes, I exist." Would that convince you? Of course not!
- Mar 16, 2009
- 19,482
- 2
- 0
Thoughtforfood said:
The second rule of Fight Club is: you DO NOT talk about Fight Club! Third rule of Fight Club: if someone yells "stop!", goes limp, or taps out, the fight is over. Fourth rule: only two guys to a fight. Fifth rule: one fight at a time, fellas. Sixth rule: the fights are bare knuckle. No shirt, no shoes, no weapons. Seventh rule: fights will go on as long as they have to. And the eighth and final rule: if this is your first time at Fight Club, you have to fight.
- Jul 2, 2009
- 3,406
- 1
- 13,485
- Mar 16, 2009
- 19,482
- 2
- 0
usedtobefast said:
Or in simpler terms.
V - v ) t. Here v is the common direction in the particle in causing a displacement x? We have, for constant acceleration, the kinetic energy of the body and x = m a x = m ( ( V - v ) / t and the mass m, will product of the resultant acceleration a. Let us choose the body. If we represent kinetic energy by then K = ½ ( V - v ) t. Here v is the relation a. Let us choose the particle in the particle's speed at t = ½ m v². We may then K = ½ m v². We may the work done by the square of its speed at t = ½ m
- Apr 12, 2009
- 2,364
- 0
- 0
- Jul 2, 2009
- 3,406
- 1
- 13,485
TRENDING THREADS
-
Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread- Started by DNP-Old
- Replies: 36K
-
Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread- Started by Lequack
- Replies: 41K
-
Teams & Riders The Great Big Cycling Transfers, Extensions, and Rumours Thread- Started by RedheadDane
- Replies: 13K
-
Il Lombardia 2025, monument, October 11- Started by Krzysztof_O
- Replies: 792
-
European Championship 2025: Men’s RR, October 5- Started by Berniece
- Replies: 854
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram