The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
uspostal said:Sorry for getting off the topic, I'll try to refrain from doing so again in this thread.
flicker said:He is smarter than the rest of the accused dopers. Better attorneys, more money, American Icon etc. The bling masters better come up with something better than un-american. That's so weak!
Greisty said:I've read you posting now for some time in this thread about how you know exactly what this case is about: fraud. But now you're saying nobody knows what its about.
I don't care about Lance Armstrong. If he is guilty of doping, fraud, perjury, whatever, he should face justice. Whether he will or not is down to 1) whether he did anything and 2) the vagaries of the legal system.
I find it troubling to see the foaming at the mouth that occurs on this forum. Nobody really knows anything, yet everyone is certain they understand exactly what's happening. It's all just wishful, dogmatic thinking.
If you hate Armstrong, Armstrong will be found guilty and your great fantasy will be realized. If you love Armstrong, he will be vindicated, and your worldview will be maintained. Whatever. None of us really knows what's going on. This is all just masturbation.
I try to stay away from forums because they depress me about humanity. I made a mistake reading this one tonight. What a waste of time.
thehog said:First of all thank you for your post. Also thank you for watching me from afar. I've been banned for the past two months without a single post. So your obviously been watching for sometime or indeed you may be someone else? None the less I didn't come here to ridicule you or make you look stupid. You're doing a fine job of it yourself.
My point being is that Lance wants this investigation to be about doping. The fans also want it to be about doping. Then they can spout off about 'never tested positive' and jealous ex riders going after Lance. All the lovely rhetoric we've heard over the years that explains away every doping story when it comes to the Lance.
Because the investigation can't be explained away easily by the big man he's stuck. He's cornered and they're closing in. I mean if Federal Investigators who are very busy people make the time to base an entire case about you and the fact that they been ordering various people and companies in front of grand juries then there's something worth looking at. The fact that the case is still going means its got life all of it own.
Don't hit out at me. Hit out at Armstrong. He's the guy who thought it would be a good idea to buy, import, sell and traffic doping products around the world. He's the guy who thought it would be a good idea to set up phoney bank accounts to buy drugs. He's the guy who thought it a good idea to avoid paying tax in the US which denies basic services for the very people who he says he represents. He's the guy who thought it would be a good idea to use his incredible influence and force young riders to inject their bodies with chemicals. He's the guy who thought it would be a good idea to litter europe with his junk whilst at the same telling them to shut-up. He's the guy who told us his clean time and time again. He's the guy who told us that having cancer changed him whilst the same time telling cancer sufferers to believe him and trust him whilst lying about super human athletic abilities.
Go speak with him. Ask him why he did such things. You have a right to know.
I still affirm Lance has no idea what the case is about. He wants it compartmentalised so he can explain it away with rhetoric but this time not.
Seriously get out there more and ask these questions. You have the right to know.
tockit said:Not that you sound partisan or anything, but the Democrat's make the Republican's look like amateurs when it comes to dirty dealings (even though both parties are crooked as snakes).
I think he needs to give Sam Adam Jr a call now that he's finished getting Blago off the hook.
Maybe he can win Lance's case, then afterwards help him broker a deal to sell Pat McQuaid's seat on the UCI?
bobs *** said:I think there are some people who can't go a single post without interjecting their partisanship into totally apolitical discussions. The mods seem to have no problem with it (so long as you advocate the conventional wisdom around here which is somewhere between Mao and Marx.)
Hincapie doesn't have as much to lose. Lots of ex-riders who may have doped have started or been associated with successful companies that market cycling products--Motta, Merckx, Moser, Fondriest . . .thehog said:Hincapie has also lawyered up. He can't afford the big guns like Lance.
uspostal said:I believe we were sending material,food,planes, tanks you know that sort of thing to England at the 1940 mark. We had the lend lease act with Russia around the same time.providing the same thing. Poor America, We fought 2 major empires at the same time ,did Canada ??? just wondering. There 3 divisions petered out after D-Day unable to keep a steady flow on manpower up. Ok your right we played no part in anything pretaining to WW2. England did try to invade Europe by themselves and believe it flopped. Hey I like the Frenchies, they helped pile on the Brits in the Revolutionary War for us. I'm not entirely sure they helping us or just looking for a reason to pile in England.
rhubroma said:Every declining empire creates the myth of its own moral supiriority and martial glory.
Indeed the Americans were, and still are, the largest arms dealers on the planet. However, you forgot to mention that in the 30's our former president's grandfather was also selling arms to Germany, that is Nazi Germany.
I would be cautious, therefore, about playing up the US's good intentions as a promotor of aid and conflict-resolution around the globe (when it is often a direct instigator). And if the US did anything then, during WWII, it wasn't so much about fighting an evil, but to promote its own economic growth following the Great Depression (war is usually a great economic stimulus), and to ensure that Stalin wouldn't get all the spoils when it was over (it was just a matter of time when that evil was doomed to be crushed). Indeed the Germans were ultimately broken by Russia. True, the Americans paid a heavy price in ensuring their stake in the claim of the spoils. But so too, did the British, the French and many other nations who faught Hitler, above all Russia and mostly on home soil. Evidently, though, those spoils, when wayed against the colossal death toll, still were thought to provide a large enough return to the US government and its generals. And this is primarily why we faught the war. While Japan, which you neglected totally (as it didn't fit into your anti-european analysis), is a completely different story beginning with Pearl Harbor as it had propagandistically been told by the government.
Not to diminish the American contribution to the defeat of Nazi-Fascism, just to put it in more proper light. In any case times have changed.
But I digress....and can only add my second "Amen" to the Hog's caustic analysis. For LA a was no ordinary doper, for which I really have no opinion on in a sporting sense beyond it being just disagreeable to my tastes: yet he maniplated the masses via a hero myth to his own gargantuan financial benifit. That he has made cynical use of the cancer community as a "shield" to deflect attention away from his private persona as a dirty practitioner of his sport and so toward his public persona as a paladin of virtue who raises funds for cancer research. When even his so-called fund-raising organization seems as much about a business for profit as it does in aiding the sick. And that, of all the pros, he has been the most outspoken in his public claims to cleanness (with all the clavanist "hard work" rhetoric, and the annoying "I've never failed a drug test" thrown in), when privately, by force of nature, he has been the most fanatical supporter of the omertà system which has utterly corrupted the sport. But he slipped once, as if too many lies could not go wihout a trace, and allowed the public to see the private persona beneath the public one: the Simeoni incident.
As for the rest: have a nice day and good luck in your continued patriotism. For what it's worth to your very small world.
Benotti69 said:eloquent. Chapeau.
rhubroma said:I added another bit, in case you were interested. Cheers.
Benotti69 said:yep good add. Amazing how some people believe the drivel their tv's dish out without looking deeper. but then if it's not in a 30 sec sound bite or a tweet their attention span switches off
rhubroma said:Read Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins. Excuse me for another digression.
rhubroma said:I added another bit, in case you were interested. Cheers.
VeloFidelis said:Do you remember anything about Whitewater? I didn't think so.
thehog said:First of all thank you for your post. Also thank you for watching me from afar. I've been banned for the past two months without a single post. So your obviously been watching for sometime or indeed you may be someone else? None the less I didn't come here to ridicule you or make you look stupid. You're doing a fine job of it yourself.
My point being is that Lance wants this investigation to be about doping. The fans also want it to be about doping. Then they can spout off about 'never tested positive' and jealous ex riders going after Lance. All the lovely rhetoric we've heard over the years that explains away every doping story when it comes to the Lance.
Because the investigation can't be explained away easily by the big man he's stuck. He's cornered and they're closing in. I mean if Federal Investigators who are very busy people make the time to base an entire case about you and the fact that they been ordering various people and companies in front of grand juries then there's something worth looking at. The fact that the case is still going means its got life all of it own.
Don't hit out at me. Hit out at Armstrong. He's the guy who thought it would be a good idea to buy, import, sell and traffic doping products around the world. He's the guy who thought it would be a good idea to set up phoney bank accounts to buy drugs. He's the guy who thought it a good idea to avoid paying tax in the US which denies basic services for the very people who he says he represents. He's the guy who thought it would be a good idea to use his incredible influence and force young riders to inject their bodies with chemicals. He's the guy who thought it would be a good idea to litter europe with his junk whilst at the same telling them to shut-up. He's the guy who told us his clean time and time again. He's the guy who told us that having cancer changed him whilst the same time telling cancer sufferers to believe him and trust him whilst lying about super human athletic abilities.
Go speak with him. Ask him why he did such things. You have a right to know.
I still affirm Lance has no idea what the case is about. He wants it compartmentalised so he can explain it away with rhetoric but this time not.
Seriously get out there more and ask these questions. You have the right to know.
VeloFidelis said:An interesting post for a cycling web site. But if you are truly fans of Vidal and Chomsky, and agree that the world readily accepts revisionist history as fact; then surely you recognize, that international media stars who routinely consort with presidents, heads of state, and captains of industry, are not going to be brought down by a lowly civil servant. It is just not how thing happen in that rarified atmosphere.
The new media consultants will begin a campaign of obfuscation and subterfuge that will be absorbed by a willing global fan base that does not want to see an icon as anything else.
The naive ramblings recorded here about dramatic collapses and witness stand confessions, are the stuff of Perry Mason re-runs and about as far from reality as you can get. It will be interesting to watch all the maneuvering from this point on, but unfortunately the dramatic downfall fantasy will not play out like those salivating pundits proclaim.
Do you remember anything about Whitewater? I didn't think so.
Greisty said:I am asking questions. My questions have to do whether we actually know anything about the content of the investigation. I don't think we know as much as you think we do. We disagree. Therefore I'm stupid. Thanks.
I think I'm going to go for a bike ride now.
stephens said:If those three end up in handcuffs by the end of the year, I'll donate $200 to the charity of your choice.