Whoa easy there! I can't help who piggy backs off my postsJMBeaushrimp said:I'm starting to wonder if there's some sort of international troll union. A sort of UTI, if you will...
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Whoa easy there! I can't help who piggy backs off my postsJMBeaushrimp said:I'm starting to wonder if there's some sort of international troll union. A sort of UTI, if you will...
python said:ok, i got it - you're just another 'firm-fence -sitter' we've been thru who essentially equate the lack of the obsessive saddle sniffing to not being an apologist.
how far are willing to take the insulting of the several poster's common perception ?
andy1234 said:Whoa easy there! I can't help who piggy backs off my posts
Dr. Maserati said:Nice strawman - I never said you 'praised' Armstrong, I am pointing out that you are the one with the Lance fixation, unlike those you are trying to portray.
You did try to convince me otherwise - but your posting history lets you down.
andy1234 said:You will always end the argument around here because your prepared to spend 1001 posts analysing and reanalysing the content of everything that goes on around here. Of course it helps that you always have several buddies to help you out.
It doesn't make you right, it just makes you persistent.
here's where you failed ...checking the posting facts and habit/records when it comes to accusing people as opposed to the people accusing you.andy1234 said:You will always end the argument around here because your prepared to spend 1001 posts analysing and reanalysing the content of everything that goes on around here. Of course it helps that you always have several buddies to help you out.
It doesn't make you right, it just makes you persistent.
python said:here's where you failed ...checking the posting facts and habit/records when it comes to accusing people as opposed to the people accusing you.
i never had designated anyone you implied as friends (nor have I ever been asked for a friendship) by the people you accused of being dr.mass's 'buddies'. in fact, i never exchanged a single pm with these people nor have i ever been part of or, willing to be one, of the multiple social groups.
you're just being in need of some straw b/c you have no other argument.
Dr. Maserati said:As I don't know the names of anyone here I don't have any buddies, but nice try.
Your posting history is what makes me right - I spend no time analyzing your posts, as they pretty much say the same thing.
You revealed your true intentions in your opening posts, so when you try and feign apathy it is easy to disprove, you just didn't expect someone to check you out.
andy1234 said:My intention is to have a few relatively meaningless conversations about doping, then move on.
Something you seem unable to grasp.
It interests me. It doesn't drive me to 4000 posts on the matter.
To repeat, your assumptions are wrong.
I'd suggest you save yourself a long winded response, but what else are you going do with your time?