Will this stick without solid evidence? The people Landis have implicated has a lot of resources. They can easily have a long smear campaign against Landis, and deny any involvement. I reckon Landis needs solid evidence or that someone confirms his story.
This is Steffen Kjærgaards take on the situation:
I do not know me against that Floyd allegedly saying here. When I came to the team, I was certainly not envisaged doping in any way. This culture is completely alien to me, "says Kjærgaard to VG Nett Thursday morning.
- Is this bad for you?
- Yes, but it is uncomfortable. But most of all I get upset about an old ghost that is pulled out. If there is ANY truth in any of this, I must have been inside the hell of naive, "says Kjærgaard to VG Nett.
Still believe Armstrong was clean
He has always thought that Lance Armstrong has been dope-free throughout his career. That attitude he stands by.
- I have no reason to believe otherwise.
- And you can with hand on heart say that you never cheated in the course of his career?
- That's right. I belonged in no way in the world presented in this story, says Steffen Kjærgaard.
http://www.vg.no/sport/sykkel/artikkel.php?artid=10006873
Dag Otto Lauritzen take on the situation:
- Not many have been tested as much as Lance
TV 2 bike expert Dag Otto Lauritzen is glad that Landis tour four years after the scandal admits lies.
- It is good that Landis ultimately at last admitted doping. All have been sure that he has done it, but he has denied it the whole time, "said Lauritzen told Dagbladet.
No credibility
- The credibility of Landis is not high, to say the least. He has lied throughout his career. He may be trying to excuse himself, "said TV commentator 2.
- I do not think there are so many that have been tested as much as Lance, it would be strange if it's true. He had nothing to gain by making a comeback, says Lautritzen.
- You believe that Armstrong has always been clean?
- There are many who suspect Lance because he's done inhuman results. He is never been caught, and I can not understand that he is so stupid that he makes a comeback after so many years and have everything to lose. It is an indication.
53-year-old Lauritzen find it strange that Landis implicates others the second when he first admitted doping.
- This is only allegations and excuses. I think it is good that Landis comes out, and no longer believes he is innocent convicted. When he was caught I thought it was sad, but it is good that he was taken.
http://www.dagbladet.no/2010/05/20/.../sykkel/tour_de_france/floyd_landis/11788448/