Le Tour 2018 stage 17: BDL to Saint-Lary-Soulan 65k

Page 15 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Valv.Piti said:
rick james said:
Oliwright said:
Sky's strength is **** stupid.
TBF this might be the best grand tour team in history, but I'm bored!

Common Nairo, Mikel, Romain, Tom, Chris can someone attack ffs.
Are they all happy with not winning?
2016 sky tour team was stronger
It most certainly wasn't.

This team is insane and has all parts covered, especially the mountains.
No love for 2012? A year which had Froome and Porte as climbing domestiques. Was so good with 7 riders, that they could take Cavendish and a lead-out man and win three sprints, including on the Champs Elysees as well.
 
rick james said:
Oliwright said:
Sky's strength is **** stupid.
TBF this might be the best grand tour team in history, but I'm bored!

Common Nairo, Mikel, Romain, Tom, Chris can someone attack ffs.
Are they all happy with not winning?
2016 sky tour team was stronger

In 2016 it was Froome, G, Landa, Stannard, Rowe, Poels, Kiri, Nieve, Henao.

So looking at the differences & that it's now 8 riders, and given that Landa did f*ck all that tour it's basically:

Moscon, Kwiat, Castro & Bernal vs Stannard, Nieve, Henao, & Kiri.

IMO I prefer 2018, especially as I think G, Rowe & Poels are better than ever.
 
DFA123 said:
Valv.Piti said:
rick james said:
Oliwright said:
Sky's strength is **** stupid.
TBF this might be the best grand tour team in history, but I'm bored!

Common Nairo, Mikel, Romain, Tom, Chris can someone attack ffs.
Are they all happy with not winning?
2016 sky tour team was stronger
It most certainly wasn't.

This team is insane and has all parts covered, especially the mountains.
No love for 2012? A year which had Froome and Porte as climbing domestiques. Was so good with 7 riders, that they could take Cavendish and a lead-out man and win three sprints, including on the Champs Elysees as well.
This team is much better, but 2012 was probably better relatively to their weak opponents.
 
DFA123 said:
Valv.Piti said:
rick james said:
Oliwright said:
Sky's strength is **** stupid.
TBF this might be the best grand tour team in history, but I'm bored!

Common Nairo, Mikel, Romain, Tom, Chris can someone attack ffs.
Are they all happy with not winning?
2016 sky tour team was stronger
It most certainly wasn't.

This team is insane and has all parts covered, especially the mountains.
No love for 2012? A year which had Froome and Porte as climbing domestiques. Was so good with 7 riders, that they could take Cavendish and a lead-out man and win three sprints, including on the Champs Elysees as well.
2012 was such a joke that Wiggins could lead Cavendish out for a stage win.
 
Pirazziattacks said:
DFA123 said:
Valv.Piti said:
rick james said:
Oliwright said:
Sky's strength is **** stupid.
TBF this might be the best grand tour team in history, but I'm bored!

Common Nairo, Mikel, Romain, Tom, Chris can someone attack ffs.
Are they all happy with not winning?
2016 sky tour team was stronger
It most certainly wasn't.

This team is insane and has all parts covered, especially the mountains.
No love for 2012? A year which had Froome and Porte as climbing domestiques. Was so good with 7 riders, that they could take Cavendish and a lead-out man and win three sprints, including on the Champs Elysees as well.
2012 was such a joke that Wiggins could lead Cavendish out for a stage win.
Yeah, that was ludicrously dominant. The teams of the last few years might have more depth of talent - but nothing comes close to Froome as a super-domestique and Porte as back-up, in terms of aabsolute quality.