Serious question, are you trolling, or just somehow unable to see what the issue is? Not exaggerating, half of the race thread was people losing their mind at every turn because other riders dared not do exactly what they wanted to minimize Pogacar's chances of winning the race (as well as the obvious laughable double standards and seething jokes), because that's by far the most important thing for those people. And this went of for 5 hours, over and over. There was probably 10+ posters who if I was in their place yesterday, especially considering what the end result was, I wouldn't dare come back here again. It's insane to me how people like Red Rick and Netserk can conduct themselves in a manner like that again and again and still supposedly be respected members. The topic has nothing to do with Pogacar not winning, but I suspect you understand this and are just reflecting.
Instead your post is about Pogacar not being normal, I can guarantee you that there isn't anyone in this forum who disagrees. So what's the general point then, the best riders should do 3 races per season, so we only have to "suffer" them in those races and are "freed" the rest of the time? That's been a popular one here, pining for the days were proven dopers didn't race or were trash the rest of the season and then wont TDF, because they weren't greedy. Unbelievable.
If anything, one of cycling's issues is that the best so rarely meet throughout the year, it should always be encouraged. Remco racing Flanders was great and actually put Pogacar's performances into perspective, destroying Wout and only 40s behind MVP despite spending so much more energy. But if the sentiment is that they are actually racing motorbikes out there then I don't see much point following, either in Pogacar's era or after that.