• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Le Tour 2018 stage 17: BDL to Saint-Lary-Soulan 65k

Page 27 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
Valv.Piti said:
DFA123 said:
Great ride by Quintana and Movistar today. Turns out they weren't riding for team classification, and that Valverde wasn't just riding for himself after all.

They just haven't had the legs until now to trouble the big guys.
Cant do more if you dont have legs. They have tried on every stage was that possible to do anything.
Exactly, Valverde has repeatedly gone up the road, and Quintana has tried. His attack on Alpe d'Huez showed he just didn't have it, but good to see they have at least salvaged something from the race. Quintana could be a big threat for the Vuelta now I think. His form curve looks a bit 2016-ish. Unless, of course, aonther 70kg alien turns up out of nowhere.

Quintana always loses races in the first half.
 
Re:

Zinoviev Letter said:
Imagine trying to explain this Tour top 4 to someone in 2012.

There’s a second rate cobbled classics hopeful poised to win the Tour de France. An up and coming TT specialist is his main competition. One of the least talented domestiques in the whole WT is in third. And a professional ski jumper is in fourth.

You’d have ended up subjected to a well meaning psychiatric intervention.

I remember how this forum, me included, laughed at SKY when they formed the team and stated that the goal was to win the Tour within 5 years. Boy, were we wrong.
 
Mar 12, 2018
315
0
0
Visit site
Re:

Zinoviev Letter said:
Imagine trying to explain this Tour top 4 to someone in 2012.

There’s a second rate cobbled classics hopeful poised to win the Tour de France. An up and coming TT specialist is his main competition. One of the least talented domestiques in the whole WT is in third. And a professional ski jumper is in fourth.

You’d have ended up subjected to a well meaning psychiatric intervention.

In 2012? Where Froome was the best climber :lol:
 
arvc40 said:
SKSemtex said:
Waw. It looks like to do the Giro-Tour double is really probably impossible nowadays.

Indeed !. If Froome can’t do it nobody can. I imagine he has felt the pressure of opinion during this period, can’t help matters.

But Dumoulin is also almost doing it. Second in Giro, second in Tour arguably would be the best attempt since Pantani as well.

I would actually argue the opposite and say the double looks more possible now with Dumoulin's and Froome's performances this year than it did in the past.
 
Re:

Zinoviev Letter said:
Imagine trying to explain this Tour top 4 to someone in 2012.

There’s a second rate cobbled classics hopeful poised to win the Tour de France. An up and coming TT specialist is his main competition. One of the least talented domestiques in the whole WT is in third. And a professional ski jumper is in fourth.

You’d have ended up subjected to a well meaning psychiatric intervention.

:lol:
 
Re: Re:

MuskyOurSaviour said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Imagine trying to explain this Tour top 4 to someone in 2012.

There’s a second rate cobbled classics hopeful poised to win the Tour de France. An up and coming TT specialist is his main competition. One of the least talented domestiques in the whole WT is in third. And a professional ski jumper is in fourth.

You’d have ended up subjected to a well meaning psychiatric intervention.

In 2012? Where Froome was the best climber :lol:

You are right. I should have said 2011. It was up until the latter part of that season, mid career, that Froome was a nobody and generally considered, to the limited extent that he was considered at all, to be lucky to have a pro contract. Thomas was a young cobbles contender, not in the same league as the best, but considered a possibility to maybe one day win a Monument. Dumoulin was a Rabobank U23 rider, considered a possible future ITT champ. Roglic was a ski jumper.
 
Re: Re:

Walkman said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Imagine trying to explain this Tour top 4 to someone in 2012.

There’s a second rate cobbled classics hopeful poised to win the Tour de France. An up and coming TT specialist is his main competition. One of the least talented domestiques in the whole WT is in third. And a professional ski jumper is in fourth.

You’d have ended up subjected to a well meaning psychiatric intervention.

I remember how this forum, me included, laughed at SKY when they formed the team and stated that the goal was to win the Tour within 5 years. Boy, were we wrong.

And they got two no hope lads from Barloworld to add up to the number since they were Brits!
 
Re: Re:

Rollthedice said:
Walkman said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Imagine trying to explain this Tour top 4 to someone in 2012.

There’s a second rate cobbled classics hopeful poised to win the Tour de France. An up and coming TT specialist is his main competition. One of the least talented domestiques in the whole WT is in third. And a professional ski jumper is in fourth.

You’d have ended up subjected to a well meaning psychiatric intervention.

I remember how this forum, me included, laughed at SKY when they formed the team and stated that the goal was to win the Tour within 5 years. Boy, were we wrong.

And they got two no hope lads from Barloworld to add up to the number since they were Brits!

This forum is basically a collection of incorrect cycling predictions and fanfiction.
 
Re: Re:

Zinoviev Letter said:
MuskyOurSaviour said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Imagine trying to explain this Tour top 4 to someone in 2012.

There’s a second rate cobbled classics hopeful poised to win the Tour de France. An up and coming TT specialist is his main competition. One of the least talented domestiques in the whole WT is in third. And a professional ski jumper is in fourth.

You’d have ended up subjected to a well meaning psychiatric intervention.

In 2012? Where Froome was the best climber :lol:

You are right. I should have said 2011. It was up until the latter part of that season, mid career, that Froome was a nobody and generally considered, to the limited extent that he was considered at all, to be lucky to have a pro contract. Thomas was a young cobbles contender, not in the same league as the best, but considered a possibility to maybe one day win a Monument. Dumoulin was a Rabobank U23 rider, considered a possible future ITT champ. Roglic was a ski jumper.

This goes to show that perceived wisdom and historical assumptions about what kind of rider can do what were wide of the mark. That particular rule book has been torn up and re-written.